Understanding the effects of process-focused versus outcome-focused thought in response to advertising

被引:128
作者
Escalas, JE
Luce, MF
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Owen Grad Sch Management, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Fuqua Sch Business, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/422107
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research on mental simulation finds differential effects for process versus outcome focus. We manipulate the focus of participants' thoughts while viewing advertisements and find that under low to moderate involvement, argument strength has a greater effect on behavioral intentions when participants focus on the process versus the outcome of product use. This differential advantage of process-focused thought reverses under conditions of high involvement. The apparent reason for the sensitivity of process-focused thought to argument strength under low to moderate involvement is that a process focus leads to the relatively spontaneous formulation of a plan to purchase given strong, but not weak, ad arguments.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 285
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   PSYCHOLOGICAL STATUS OF THE SCRIPT CONCEPT [J].
ABELSON, RP .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1981, 36 (07) :715-729
[2]   DIMENSIONS OF CONSUMER EXPERTISE [J].
ALBA, JW ;
HUTCHINSON, JW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1987, 13 (04) :411-454
[3]  
Anand P., 1989, Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising, P135
[5]  
[Anonymous], REMEMBERING
[6]   The unbearable automaticity of being [J].
Bargh, JA ;
Chartrand, TL .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1999, 54 (07) :462-479
[7]   EFFECTS OF INFORMATION PRESENTATION FORMAT ON CONSUMER INFORMATION ACQUISITION STRATEGIES [J].
BETTMAN, JR ;
KAKKAR, P .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1977, 3 (04) :233-240
[8]  
Bruner, 1990, ACTS MEANING
[9]   EFFECT OF IMAGINING AN EVENT ON EXPECTATIONS FOR EVENT - INTERPRETATION IN TERMS OF AVAILABILITY HEURISTIC [J].
CARROLL, JS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 14 (01) :88-96