On the cost of syntactic ambiguity in human language comprehension: an individual differences approach

被引:46
作者
Bornkessel, ID [1 ]
Fiebach, CJ [1 ]
Friederici, AD [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Human Cognit & Brain Sci, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
来源
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH | 2004年 / 21卷 / 01期
关键词
sentence processing; ERPs; reading span; syntactic ambiguity; inhibition;
D O I
10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.05.007
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
We present an event-related brain potential (ERP) study demonstrating that high and low span readers show qualitatively different brain responses in the comprehension of ambiguous and complex linguistic stimuli. During the processing of ambiguous German sentences, low span readers showed a broadly distributed, sustained positivity, whereas high span participants showed a shorter, topographically more focused negativity. Qualitatively similar effects were observable in response to (complex) object-initial sentences. Additionally, a neural effect reflecting reanalysis in sentences disambiguated in a dispreferred way (P600) was observable only for high span readers, while the low span group showed an N400-like response. These neurophysiological findings support the notion that individual working memory capacity as measured by the reading span test influences sentence processing mechanisms and are compatible with the hypothesis that low span readers cannot effectively inhibit dispreferred readings. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 21
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Caplan D, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P77
[2]   Working memory, inhibitory control, and reading disability [J].
Chiappe, P ;
Hasher, L ;
Siegel, LS .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2000, 28 (01) :8-17
[3]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY AND READING [J].
DANEMAN, M ;
CARPENTER, PA .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1980, 19 (04) :450-466
[4]   Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach [J].
Engle, RW ;
Tuholski, SW ;
Laughlin, JE ;
Conway, ARA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1999, 128 (03) :309-331
[5]   RECOVERY FROM MISANALYSES OF GARDEN-PATH SENTENCES [J].
FERREIRA, F ;
HENDERSON, JM .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1991, 30 (06) :725-745
[6]   Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: the processing of German WH-questions [J].
Fiebach, CJ ;
Schlesewsky, M ;
Friederici, AD .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2002, 47 (02) :250-272
[7]   FILLER DRIVEN PARSING - A STUDY OF GAP FILLING IN DUTCH [J].
FRAZIER, L ;
DARCAIS, GBF .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1989, 28 (03) :331-344
[8]   Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses [J].
Friederici, AD ;
Steinhauer, K ;
Mecklinger, A ;
Meyer, M .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 47 (03) :193-221
[9]   Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing [J].
Friederici, AD .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2002, 6 (02) :78-84
[10]   Syntactic parsing preferences and their on-line revisions: a spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials [J].
Friederici, AD ;
Mecklinger, A ;
Spencer, KM ;
Steinhauer, K ;
Donchin, E .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2001, 11 (02) :305-323