Traditional versus telenursing outpatient management of patients with cancer with new ostomies

被引:34
作者
Bohnenkamp, SK [1 ]
McDonald, P
Lopez, AM
Krupinski, E
Blackett, A
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr, Tucson, AZ USA
[2] Arizona Canc Ctr, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Arizona Telemed Program, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1188/04.ONF.1005-1010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose/Objectives: To measure the impact of telenursing on patients discharged with ostomiles resulting from cancer treatment. Design: Quasi-experimental design with surveys. Setting: Large tertiary care center in the southwestern United States. Sample: 28 patients with cancer in two groups : traditional home health and home health plus telenursing. Methods: Recorded the number of home health and telenursing contacts, dates when ostomy self-care needs were met, supplies used, and distance travelled. Patients completed a satisfaction survey and Macklebusts Ostomy Adjustment Scale. Main Research Variables: Type of care, costs, patients satisfaction ostomy adjustment and time to achieve ostomy self-care. Findings: Telenursing patients indicated higher satisfaction. The home health group averaged one more home health visit per patient (Telenursing (x) over bar = three visits). Overall costs for both types of visits were about equal. The home health group used an average of four more pouches per patient, with an increased cost of $52 per patient. Telenursing patients believed that telenursing made care more accessible, they preferred telemedicine rather than waiting for face-to-face visits but still believed that face-to-face visits were better. Conclusions: Combining traditional home health and telenursing is feasible for supporting discharged patients with new ostomies and enhances traditional home health, resulting in increased satisfaction overall. Implications for Nursing: Oncology nurses should develop telenursing programs that include patient and family education regarding oncology issues.
引用
收藏
页码:1005 / 1010
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Allen A, 1998, Telemed Today, V6, P10
[2]  
Bashshur R L, 1995, Telemed J, V1, P19, DOI 10.1089/tmj.1.1995.1.19
[3]   Home-based telemedicine: A survey of ethical issues [J].
Bauer, KA .
CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 2001, 10 (02) :137-146
[4]  
BONDMASS M, 1997, CASE MANAGEMENT ADVI, V8, P48
[5]  
Brogna L, 1985, J Enterostomal Ther, V12, P205
[6]   Patient satisfaction with telemedicine consultation in primary care: Comparison of ratings of medical and mental health applications [J].
Callahan, EJ ;
Hilty, DM ;
Nesbitt, TS .
TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL, 1998, 4 (04) :363-369
[7]   Cost analysis of telehomecare [J].
Dansky, KH ;
Palmer, L ;
Shea, D ;
Bowles, KH .
TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL AND E-HEALTH, 2001, 7 (03) :225-232
[8]  
DOUGHTY D, 1992, CANCER, V70, P1390, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19920901)70:3+<1390::AID-CNCR2820701529>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-8
[10]  
Doughty D B, 2001, J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, V28, P1