Comparative study of variable size perturbation and observation maximum power point trackers for PV systems

被引:63
作者
D'Souza, Neil S. [1 ]
Lopes, Luiz A. C. [1 ]
Liu, XueJun [1 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
MPPT; Photovoltaic; Fuzzy; Peak current control; variable size; Perturbation and observation; TRACKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsr.2009.09.012
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Perturbation and observation (P&O) maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithms are common in photovoltaic (PV) systems due to its ease of implementation However, operation with fixed size perturbations results in a trade-off between speed of response and maximum power yield in the steady-state. This paper discusses the use of fuzzy logic and non-switching zone schemes for Implementing variable size perturbations for improved transient and steady-state responses The potential performance of four different P&O algorithms is investigated by means of simulations Experimental results are then used to verify how the computational burden of each algorithm and (tie processing speed of a digital signal processor (DSP) affect the performance of each method in a prototype The best performance is achieved with a new strategy called non-switching zones in the V-PV x I-PV plane The power electronics converter operates with duty cycle (D) equal to 0 or 1, depending on which non-MPP region the system operates, pushing the operating point the fastest way possible towards the MPP region, for improved transient response At the MPP region, a reduced Fuzzy P&O MPPT algorithm optimized for small variations around the MPP is used for reduced oscillations and increased power yield Ill the steady-state (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 305
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Introduction [J].
Yang-Tse Cheng ;
Trevor Page ;
George M. Pharr ;
Michael V. Swain ;
Kathryn J. Wahl .
Journal of Materials Research, 2004, 19 (1) :1-2
[2]   An intelligent maximum power point tracker using peak current control [J].
D'Souza, NS ;
Lopes, LAC ;
Liu, XJ .
2005 IEEE 36TH POWER ELECTRONIC SPECIALISTS CONFERENCE (PESC), VOLS 1-3, 2005, :172-177
[3]  
DSOUZA NS, 2006, P 19 CAN C EL COMP E, P1310
[4]  
DSOUZA NS, 2006, THESIS CONCORDIA U
[5]   Comparison of photovoltaic array maximum power point tracking techniques [J].
Esram, Trishan ;
Chapman, Patrick L. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, 2007, 22 (02) :439-449
[6]   Dynamic maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic arrays using ripple correlation control [J].
Esram, Trishan ;
Kimball, Jonathan W. ;
T Krein, Philip ;
Chapman, Patrick L. ;
Midya, Pallab .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2006, 21 (05) :1282-1291
[7]   Optimization of perturb and observe maximum power point tracking method [J].
Femia, N ;
Petrone, G ;
Spagnuolo, G ;
Vitelli, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2005, 20 (04) :963-973
[8]   Implementation of a DSP-controlled photovoltaic system with peak power tracking [J].
Hua, CC ;
Lin, JG ;
Shen, CM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 1998, 45 (01) :99-107
[9]   MAXIMUM PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER TRACKING - AN ALGORITHM FOR RAPIDLY CHANGING ATMOSPHERIC CONDITIONS [J].
HUSSEIN, KH ;
MUTA, I ;
HOSHINO, T ;
OSAKADA, M .
IEE PROCEEDINGS-GENERATION TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION, 1995, 142 (01) :59-64
[10]  
Jain S., 2004, IEEE Power Electronics Letters, V2, P16, DOI 10.1109/LPEL.2004.828444