Health-related quality-of-life measurement in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer - Taking stock

被引:159
作者
Goodwin, PJ
Black, JT
Bordeleau, LJ
Ganz, PA
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Samuel Lunenfeld Res Inst, Div Clin Epidemiol,Dept Med, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Med, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2003年 / 95卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/95.4.263
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Measurement of health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer has become common. In this review, we take stock of the contribution that HRQOL measurement in breast cancer clinical trials makes to clinical decision making regarding selection of optimal treatment. A series of MEDLINE searches was conducted to identify all randomized trials in breast cancer that included self-reported HRQOL or psychosocial outcomes. A total of 256 citations were identified that included HRQOL or psychosocial outcomes in breast cancer patients, and 66 of these involved randomized clinical trials of treatment. These 66 reports of breast cancer clinical trials of treatment are discussed in this review. Forty-six of the trials evaluated biomedical interventions, and 20 evaluated psychosocial interventions. Among the biomedical trials, eight trials evaluated HRQOL in primary management of breast cancer, seven trials evaluated HRQOL in adjuvant therapy of breast cancer patients, 20 trials involved metastatic breast cancer, eight trials involved symptom control/supportive care, and three trials evaluated different approaches to investigation or follow-up of breast cancer patients. Among the psychosocial trials, 13 trials evaluated HRQOL in adjuvant therapy of breast cancer patients, and their partners or spouses, six trials involved metastatic breast cancer, and one trial focused on symptom control. We found that the contribution of HRQOL measurement to clinical decision making depended on the clinical setting. In primary management of breast cancer, where medical outcomes of several treatment options are equivalent, HRQOL measurement provided added information for clinical decision making beyond that of traditional medical outcomes. In trials in the adjuvant setting, HRQOL measurement did not influence clinical decision making. In metastatic disease, HRQOL outcomes provided little information beyond that obtained from traditional medical outcomes, including toxicity. In the symptom control/supportive care setting, results of HRQOL questionnaires targeting specific symptoms (e.g., emesis) guided treatment decisions. In psychosocial intervention trials, psychosocial and/or HRQOL measurements often provided the only outcome information; therefore, selection of instruments that captured attributes likely to be altered by the intervention was essential. Until results of ongoing trials in breast cancer are available, caution is recommended in initiating new HRQOL studies unless treatment equivalency is expected, or unless the HRQOL questions target unique or specific issues that can only be addressed through patient self-report, including outcomes of psychosocial interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 281
页数:19
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]   THE EORTC MODULAR APPROACH TO QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENT IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
CULL, A ;
KAASA, S ;
SPRANGERS, MAG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 1994, 23 (02) :75-96
[2]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[3]  
Aaronson NK, 1991, EFFECT CANC QUALITY, P185
[4]  
Abe O, 1998, LANCET, V352, P930
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Consens Statement, V8, P1
[6]  
[Anonymous], NEDERLANDS TIJDSCHRI
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1992, PSYCHOONCOLOGY
[8]  
ARATHUZIK D, 1994, CANCER NURS, V17, P207
[9]   BREAST-CANCER IN ELDERLY WOMEN - A CANCER-RESEARCH CAMPAIGN TRIAL COMPARING TREATMENT WITH TAMOXIFEN AND OPTIMAL SURGERY WITH TAMOXIFEN ALONE [J].
BATES, T ;
RILEY, DL ;
HOUGHTON, J ;
FALLOWFIELD, L ;
BAUM, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (05) :591-594
[10]  
Bernhard J, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P517, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980315/15)17:5/7<517::AID-SIM799>3.0.CO