Audience Engagement with COVID-19 News: The Impact of Lockdown and Live Coverage, and the Role of Polarization

被引:33
作者
Mihelj, Sabina [1 ]
Kondor, Katherine [1 ]
Stetka, Vaclav [1 ]
机构
[1] Loughborough Univ, Ctr Res Commun & Culture, Loughborough, Leics, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
COVID-19; news; audiences; polarization; media events; eastern Europe; SOCIAL MEDIA;
D O I
10.1080/1461670X.2021.1931410
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Existing research on media and the COVID-19 pandemic is largely based on quantitative data, focused on digital media, limited to single-country studies, and often West-centred. As such, it has limited capacity to provide a holistic account of the causes and consequences of audience engagement with COVID-19 news, or to consider the impact of systemic political and media factors. To compensate for that, we examine a large set of qualitative interviews and media diaries collected in four eastern European countries during the first wave of the pandemic. We show that changes in news consumption-including the resurgence of television and decline of print consumption-were not driven solely by audience demand for up-to-date information, but also by practical constrains of home-bound life in lockdown, and the introduction of live briefings. Our findings underscore disruption and uncertainty as key elements of audience experiences and highlight the markedly privatized and depoliticized nature of public debate in the early phase of the pandemic. We argue that the pandemic was an unpredictable, open-ended, and exhausting media event with high potential for divisiveness and polarization, especially in contexts marked by low levels of media freedom, declining democratic standards, and elite-led politicization of the crisis.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 587
页数:19
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Ebola at the borders: newspaper representations and the politics of border control [J].
Abeysinghe, Sudeepa .
THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, 2016, 37 (03) :452-467
[2]  
Allington D, 2021, PSYCHOL MED, V51, P1763, DOI [10.1017/S003329172000224X, 10.1017/S0033291721000593]
[3]  
Basch Corey H, 2017, J Prev Med Public Health, V50, P133, DOI 10.3961/jpmph.16.107
[4]  
Beauchamp Z., 2020, Vox
[5]  
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[6]  
Briggs CL, 2016, MAKING HEALTH PUBLIC: HOW NEWS COVERAGE IS REMAKING MEDIA, MEDICINE, AND CONTEMPORARY LIFE, P1, DOI 10.4324/9781315658049
[7]   Impact of Covid-19 on the media system. Communicative and democratic consequences of news consumption during the outbreak [J].
Casero-Ripolles, Andreu .
PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2020, 29 (02)
[8]  
Chadwick Andrew., 2013, HYBRID MEDIA SYSTEM, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199759477.001.0001
[9]   Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak [J].
Chew, Cynthia ;
Eysenbach, Gunther .
PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (11)
[10]  
Couldry N, 2007, CONSUM PUBLIC LIFE, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230800823