Efficacy and safety of abacavir plus lamivudine versus didanosine plus stavudine when combined with a protease inhibitor, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, or both in HIV-1 positive antiretroviral-naive persons

被引:10
作者
MacArthur, RD
Chen, L
Peng, G
Novak, RM
van den Berg-Wolf, M
Kozal, M
Besch, L
Yurik, T
Schmetter, B
Henley, C
Dehlinger, M
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Div Infect Dis, Dept Med, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Temple Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[5] Yale Univ, New Haven, CT USA
[6] Tulane Univ, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[7] Social & Sci Syst, Silver Spring, MD USA
[8] So New Jersey Clin Trials, Camden, NJ USA
[9] NIAID, Div Aids, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
来源
HIV CLINICAL TRIALS | 2004年 / 5卷 / 06期
关键词
antiretroviral agents; controlled clinical trials; highly active antiretroviral therapy; reverse transcriptase inhibitors;
D O I
10.1310/WEQG-QTHL-DL3X-FTXC
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Purpose: The combination of abacavir + lamivudine (ABC+3TC) versus didanosine + stavudine (ddl+d4T), each combined with other classes of antiretrovirals (ARVs) in ARV-naive patients, was compared for the combined endpoint of time to plasma HIV RNA > 50 copies/mL (at or after the 8-month visit) or death (primary endpoint) in a nested substudy of an ongoing multicenter randomized trial. Method: The substudy enrolled 182 patients; mean HIV RNA and CD4+ cell counts at baseline were 5.1 log(10) copies/mL and 212 cells/mm(3), respectively. Results: After a median follow-up of 28 months, rates of primary endpoint were 57.2 and 67.8 per 100 person-years for the ABC+3TC and ddl+d4T groups (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-1.14, p = .23). Conclusion: There was a trend for treatments containing ABC+3TC to be better than treatments containing ddI+d4T with respect to HIV RNA decreases, CD4+ cell count increases, and tolerability.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 370
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Aboulker JP, 2002, LANCET, V359, P733
[2]  
*CDC, 1992, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, P41
[3]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[4]   Abacavir versus zidovudine combined with lamivudine and efavirenz, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults [J].
DeJesus, E ;
Herrera, G ;
Teofilo, E ;
Gerstoft, J ;
Buendia, CB ;
Brand, JD ;
Brothers, CH ;
Hernandez, J ;
Castillo, SA ;
Bonny, T ;
Lanier, ER ;
Scott, TR .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 39 (07) :1038-1046
[5]   A comparison of stavudine, didanosine and indinavir with zidovudine, lamivudine and indinavir for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infected individuals: Selection of thymidine analog regimen therapy (START II) [J].
Eron, JJ ;
Murphy, RL ;
Peterson, D ;
Pottage, J ;
Parenti, DM ;
Jemsek, J ;
Swindells, S ;
Sepulveda, G ;
Bellos, N ;
Rashbaum, BC ;
Esinhart, J ;
Schoellkopf, N ;
Grosso, R ;
Stevens, M .
AIDS, 2000, 14 (11) :1601-1610
[6]  
GALLANT JE, 2003, 43 ANN ICAAC SEPT 14
[7]   SOLO:: 48-week efficacy and safety comparison of once-daily fosamprenavir/ritonavir versus twice-daily nelfinavir in naive HIV-1-infected patients [J].
Gathe, JC ;
Ive, P ;
Wood, R ;
Schürmann, D ;
Bellos, NC ;
DeJesus, E ;
Gladysz, A ;
Garris, C ;
Yeo, J .
AIDS, 2004, 18 (11) :1529-1537
[8]   Abacavir hypersensitivity reaction [J].
Hewitt, RG .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 34 (08) :1137-1142
[9]   NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION FROM INCOMPLETE OBSERVATIONS [J].
KAPLAN, EL ;
MEIER, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 53 (282) :457-481
[10]   Lamivudine in combination with zidovudine stavudine, or didanosine in patients with HIV-1 infection. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial [J].
Kuritzkes, DR ;
Marschner, I ;
Johnson, VA ;
Bassett, R ;
Eron, JJ ;
Fischl, MA ;
Murphy, RL ;
Fife, K ;
Maenza, J ;
Rosandich, ME ;
Bell, D ;
Wood, K ;
Sommadossi, JP ;
Pettinelli, C .
AIDS, 1999, 13 (06) :685-694