Effect of live weight and differing economic values on responses to selection for milk fat, protein, volume, and live weight

被引:28
作者
Spelman, RJ
Garrick, DJ
机构
[1] Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North
关键词
selection responses; live weight; economic values; New Zealand;
D O I
10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76211-8
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Five traits of major economic importance in the New Zealand dairy industry are milk volume, milk fat, milk protein, live weight, and survival. This study evaluated the impact of live weight as a trait in the selection objectives for the New Zealand dairy industry. Live weight of the lactating cow is an important measure because it reflects feeding costs via maintenance feed and salvage values of cows to be culled. In addition, selection responses were evaluated for differing relative economic values for milk protein and milk fat, and selection indexes that included or excluded phenotypic and genotypic correlations between traits were compared. Inclusion of live weight, with a negative economic value in a four-trait selection index with milk, milk fat, and protein resulted in higher economic response. Protein response to selection was not more than 2% when the relative economic value for the ratio of protein to milk fat exceeded 5:1 in a two-trait model; however, milk fat response decreased by over 10%. When a negative relative economic value was assigned to milk fat, economic returns were lower because of lower milk fat responses and the lack of higher protein responses compared with the same ratio for relative economic value but a positive weight for milk fat. Accounting for phenotypic and genetic correlations in deriving selection index weight improved economic response 5%.
引用
收藏
页码:2557 / 2562
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   GENETIC-PARAMETERS FOR MILK-PRODUCTION AND BODY SIZE IN NEW-ZEALAND HOLSTEIN-FRIESIAN AND JERSEY [J].
AHLBORN, G ;
DEMPFLE, L .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1992, 31 (3-4) :205-219
[2]   ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS OF PROTEIN TESTING FOR SELECTION [J].
ANDERSON, RD ;
EVERETT, RW ;
VANVLECK, LD .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1978, 61 (01) :102-108
[3]  
*DEP STAT, 1995, NZ OFF YB
[4]  
GARRICK DJ, 1993, PROC NEW ZEAL SOC AN, V53, P91
[5]  
Harris B. L., 1996, Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production, V56, P12
[6]   NET RETURNS FROM SELECTION UNDER VARIOUS COMPONENT TESTING PLANS AND MILK PRICING SCHEMES [J].
KUIPERS, A ;
SHOOK, GE .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1980, 63 (06) :1006-1018
[7]   ESTIMATION OF GENETIC GAIN IN MILK YIELD BY SELECTION IN A CLOSED HERD OF DAIRY CATTLE [J].
RENDEL, JM ;
ROBERTSON, A .
JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 1950, 50 (01) :1-8
[8]   Utilisation of marker assisted selection in a commercial dairy cow population [J].
Spelman, R ;
Garrick, D .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1997, 47 (02) :139-147
[9]  
Van Vleck LD, 1987, GENETICS ANIMAL SCI
[10]  
VANVLECK LD, 1985, NOTES THEORY APPL SE