Methadone maintenance and HIV prevention: A cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:46
作者
Zaric, GS [1 ]
Brandeau, ML
Barnett, PG
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Ivey Sch Business, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Palo Alto Vet Affairs Hlth Care Syst, Ctr Hlth Care Evaluat, Menlo Pk, CA 94205 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA 94205 USA
关键词
health; public policy; cost-effectiveness analysis; methadone; HIV/AIDS;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.46.8.1013.12025
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We assess the cost-effectiveness of maintenance treatment for heroin addiction, with emphasis on its role in preventing HIV infection. The analysis is based on a dynamic compartmental model of the HIV epidemic among a population of adults, ages 18 to 44. The population is divided into nine compartments according to infection status and risk group. The model takes into account disease transmission from drug injection and sexual contacts. The health benefits of methadone maintenance and the resulting HIV infections averted are measured in terms of Life years gained and quality-adjusted life years gained. Costs considered include all health-care costs (including cost of HIV care and other health care) and the cost of methadone maintenance. The analysis shows that expanding existing methadone maintenance programs is a cost-effective health-care intervention that can play an important role in slowing the spread of HIV and improving the length and quality of life for injection drug users (IDUs), and that such expansion is cost-effective even in populations with low HIV prevalence among IDUs. Incremental expansion of methadone maintenance programs was found to have a cost-effectiveness ratio of between $9,700 and $17,200 per life year gained, and between $6,300 and $10,900 per quality-adjusted Life year gained. Although methadone maintenance treatment is provided to IDUs,the analysis shows that significant benefits accrue to non-IDU members of the population. Sensitivity analysis shows that new methadone maintenance treatment slots will be cost-effective even if they are twice as expensive and half as effective in reducing risky behavior as current methadone maintenance programs.
引用
收藏
页码:1013 / 1031
页数:19
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, FEDERAL REGULATION M
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Drug abuse treatment: A national study of effectiveness
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, STAT ABSTR US
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Evaluating recovery services: The California Drug and Alcohol Treatment Assessment (CALDATA) general report
[5]   The cost-effectiveness of methadone maintenance as a health care intervention [J].
Barnett, PG .
ADDICTION, 1999, 94 (04) :479-488
[6]  
BARNETT PG, 1998, COST SUBSTANCE ABUSE
[7]  
BAYOUMI AM, 1999, EC METHODS MEASURING
[8]  
Bellis David J., 1993, Journal of Addictive Diseases, V12, P7, DOI 10.1300/J069v12n01_02
[9]   DRUGS, SEX AND HIV - A MATHEMATICAL-MODEL FOR NEW-YORK-CITY [J].
BLOWER, SM ;
HARTEL, D ;
DOWLATABADI, H ;
ANDERSON, RM ;
MAY, RM .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1991, 331 (1260) :171-187
[10]   Substance abuse treatment entry, retention and effectiveness: Out-of-treatment opiate injection drug users [J].
Booth, RE ;
Crowley, TJ ;
Zhang, YM .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1996, 42 (01) :11-20