Investor reaction to celebrity analysts: The case of earnings forecast revisions

被引:62
作者
Bonner, Sarah E. [1 ]
Hugon, Artur
Walther, Beverly R.
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Marshall Sch Business, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Georgia State Univ, J Mack Robinson Coll Business, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00245.x
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine the effects of analysts' celebrity on investor reaction to earnings forecast revisions. We measure celebrity as the quantity of media coverage analysts receive in sources included in the Dow Jones Interactive database, and find that media coverage is positively related to investor reaction to forecast revisions. The effect of celebrity on the reaction to forecast revisions remains significant after controlling for forecast performance variables examined in prior studies (ex post forecast accuracy, ex ante accuracy, award status, and other variables shown to be related to forecast accuracy). While these results are consistent with the familiarity of the analyst's name affecting the market reaction, we cannot rule out that our measure of celebrity is correlated with error in the performance measures we examine and/or correlated with other unexamined dimensions of forecast performance. A content analysis of a random subsample of the media coverage of our sample analysts suggests that our findings likely are not due to the increased availability of forecast revisions. Finally, an investigation of the excess returns around the quarterly earnings announcement date suggests that market participants react too strongly to forecast revisions issued by analysts with high levels of media coverage. Taken together, these findings suggest that an analyst's level of media coverage can affect the initial market reaction to his forecast revisions.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 513
页数:33
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], RIGHT TELL ROLE MASS
[2]   DETERMINANTS OF JUDGED VALIDITY [J].
ARKES, HR ;
BOEHM, LE ;
XU, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 27 (06) :576-605
[3]  
BARBER B, 2005, ALL GLITTERS EFFECT
[4]  
Barberis N., 2003, HDB EC FINANCE, P1051, DOI DOI 10.3386/W9222
[5]   DISSOCIATION OF PROCESSES IN BELIEF - SOURCE RECOLLECTION, STATEMENT FAMILIARITY, AND THE ILLUSION OF TRUTH [J].
BEGG, IM ;
ANAS, A ;
FARINACCI, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1992, 121 (04) :446-458
[6]  
BERNSTEIN R, 2001, NAVIGATE NOISE INVES
[7]   Sophistication-related differences in investors' models of the relative accuracy of analysts' forecast revisions [J].
Bonner, SE ;
Walther, BR ;
Young, SM .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2003, 78 (03) :679-706
[8]  
BOORSTEIN D, 1987, IMAGE GUIDE PSEUDOEV
[9]   EXPOSURE AND AFFECT - OVERVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RESEARCH, 1968-1987 [J].
BORNSTEIN, RF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 106 (02) :265-289
[10]   A temporal analysis of quarterly earnings thresholds: Propensities and valuation consequences [J].
Brown, LD ;
Caylor, ML .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2005, 80 (02) :423-440