Confidence intervals in repeatability and reproducibility using the Bootstrap method

被引:22
作者
Wang, FK
Eldon, YL
机构
[1] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Taipei 10626, Taiwan
[2] California Polytech STate Univ San Luis Obispo, Orfalea Coll Business, San Luis Obispo, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/1478336032000046643
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 [管理学]; 1201 [管理科学与工程]; 1202 [工商管理学]; 120202 [企业管理];
摘要
The repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) study-also called a gauge capability stuay-has been employed as part of the statistical process control program in many organizations. The objective of the study is to determine whether a measurement procedure or instrument is adequate for monitoring the performance of a process. The classical control chart method can be easily performed and calculations can be done with a spreadsheet or statistical computer software. However, this approach only provides the point estimates on the variance components of the measurement error study. In many situations, confidence intervals are more useful than point estimates, because an interval estimate enables an engineer to see both how small and how large an effect may be. In this paper, the Bootstrap method is used for obtaining the confidence intervals of the gauge variability when the control chart method is use for finding the point estimates. One real-life example is used to show the application of this control chart with the Bootstrapping method and comparisons are made with three experimental design procedures in terms of point estimates and confidence intervals for repeatability, reproducibility and total gauge variability.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 354
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
[Anonymous], SAS STAT SOFTW REL 6
[2]
Identification of the critical factors of TQM [J].
Black, SA ;
Porter, LJ .
DECISION SCIENCES, 1996, 27 (01) :1-21
[3]
Borror CM, 1997, QUAL RELIAB ENG INT, V13, P361, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1638(199711/12)13:6<361::AID-QRE126>3.0.CO
[4]
2-2
[5]
Burdick R., 1992, Confidence intervals on variance components, V1st
[6]
Confidence intervals on measures of variability in R&R studies [J].
Burdick, RK ;
Larsen, GA .
JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 29 (03) :261-273
[7]
Total quality management critical success factors, a comparison: The UK versus the USA [J].
Dayton, NA .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, 2001, 12 (03) :293-298
[9]
Dolezal KK, 1998, J QUAL TECHNOL, V30, P163
[10]
Efron B., 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP, V1st ed., DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429246593