Damage caps and settlement: A behavioral approach

被引:31
作者
Babcock, L [1 ]
Pogarsky, G
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, H John Heinz III Sch Publ Policy & Management, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Coll Business & Publ Adm, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/468054
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Since 1970, at least 30 states have enacted legislation capping the damages plaintiffs can recover in a lawsuit. Guided by previous research on suit and settlement, we outline a simple framework for examining the effects of a cap on litigant judgments and the pretrial settlement rate. We then introduce several refinements to the simple framework that are based on findings from behavioral economics and psychology. In particular, we recognize litigants may possess "role-specific biases" in information processing and may be subject to nonpecuniary influences during pretrial bargaining. Finally, the paper presents experimental evidence for the effects of a damage cap on litigants' judgments and the settlement rate. The results show that behavioral and psychological theories can greatly expand the explanatory power of models that depict the pretrial bargaining environment.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 370
页数:30
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases [J].
Babcock, L ;
Loewenstein, G .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1997, 11 (01) :109-126
[2]  
Babcock L, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P1337
[3]   Choosing the wrong pond: Social comparisons in negotiations that reflect a self-serving bias [J].
Babcock, L ;
Wang, XH ;
Loewenstein, G .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1996, 111 (01) :1-19
[4]  
BABCOCK L, 1995, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN, V22, P475
[5]  
Babcock L, 1997, LAW SOCIAL INQUIRY, V22, P401
[6]   Estimating liability risks with the media as your guide: A content analysis of media coverage of tort litigation [J].
Bailis, DS ;
MacCoun, RJ .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1996, 20 (04) :419-429
[7]  
BAUMHART R, 1968, HONEST PROFIT
[8]  
BELL GB, 1992, GA L REV, V27, P1
[9]  
BELL GB, 1992, GA L REV, V27, P4
[10]   IS ARBITRATION REALLY COMPATIBLE WITH BARGAINING [J].
BLOOM, DE .
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 1981, 20 (03) :233-244