The impact of balanced scorecards in a public sector environment - Empirical evidence from Dunedin City Council, New Zealand

被引:56
作者
Greatbanks, Richard [1 ]
Tapp, David
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Management, Sch Business, Dunedin, New Zealand
[2] Dunedin City Council, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
balanced scorecard; public sector organizations; local government; New Zealand; case studies; business excellence;
D O I
10.1108/01443570710763804
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - Many papers discuss the use of the balanced scorecard yet few provide empirical evidence within a longitudinal context. Still fewer studies present balanced scorecard evidence from within public services. This study seeks to consider the impact of implementing and using the balanced scorecard within a public service city council environment. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the recent literature within the area of public sector performance measurement. A longitudinal case study approach is adopted using interview and documentation analysis to consider the impact of balanced scorecards in a public sector Organisation. The impact of balanced scorecards was evaluated at three levels: strategic planning, team management, and individual staff performance. Findings - The empirical evidence suggests that the use of scorecards within the case Organisation enables employees to clearly appreciate their role, and focus on delivery of performance-related measures which support organisational strategy. Clarity of role appears to have a positive influence on the achievement of the organisation's business plan and excellence goals regarding the delivery of customer service. Research limitations/implications - As with any single longitudinal case study, issues of generalisability to other settings and environments can occur. Practical implications - This paper indicates the potential benefits and pitfalls of introducing and developing the balanced scorecard within a public sector Organisation. Originality/value - This research is set within a public service environment and by providing empirical case evidence contributes to the literature within this area.
引用
收藏
页码:846 / 873
页数:28
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   The (un)intended outcome of public sector performance measurement [J].
Adcroft, Andy ;
Willis, Robert .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2005, 18 (05) :386-+
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Managing Service Quality, DOI [DOI 10.1108/09604520110391315, 10.1108/09604520110391315]
[3]  
[Anonymous], CMA MAGAZINE
[4]  
Bendheim C. L., 1998, BUS SOC, V37, P306, DOI DOI 10.1177/000765039803700304
[5]  
Bolton M., 2003, WORK STUDY, V52, P20
[6]   The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives - Perceptions of participating managers [J].
Bourne, M ;
Neely, A ;
Platts, K ;
Mills, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2002, 22 (11) :1288-1310
[7]   Managing through measures: a study of impact on performance [J].
Bourne, Mike ;
Kennerley, Mike ;
Franco-Santos, Monica .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2005, 16 (04) :373-395
[8]   Public and private management: What's the difference? [J].
Boyne, GA .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2002, 39 (01) :97-122
[9]   Collaborative performance management: present gaps and future research [J].
Busi, Marco ;
Bititci, Umit S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2006, 55 (01) :7-25
[10]  
CHYAN YCL, 2004, INT J PUBLIC SECT MA, V17, P204