Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions

被引：416

作者：

Mok, Ka Yan ^{[1
]}

Shen, Geoffrey Qiping ^{[1
]}

Yang, Jing ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg & Real Estate, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China

[2] RMIT Univ, Sch Property Construct & Project Management, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT | 2015年 / 33卷 / 02期

关键词：

Stakeholder management; Mega construction projects; Research review; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; IMPACT ANALYSIS; INFRASTRUCTURE; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; SUSTAINABILITY; PERSPECTIVE; PERCEPTION; FRAMEWORK; CONFLICT;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.007

中图分类号：

C93 [管理学];

学科分类号：

12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;

摘要：

The complex and uncertain nature of mega construction projects (MCP) require an effective stakeholder management (SM) approach to accommodate conflicting stakeholder interests. Previous reviews regarding SM in construction sector are generic as their attentions have been placed on relatively small scale projects. A systematic review on SM studies in relation to MCP seems to be lacking. This paper analyzes the latest research development of this domain by reviewing selected articles published from 1997 to 2014. Four major research topics are identified: "stakeholder interests and influences", "stakeholder management process", "stakeholder analysis methods" and "stakeholder engagement". This study reveals that SM approaches in MCP are subject to national context of the project, indicating a need to identify the impact of national culture on this discipline. Moreover, traditional stakeholder analysis techniques are widely adopted in MCP notwithstanding their weaknesses; therefore a social network approach for managing stakeholder interrelationships in these projects is needed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：446 / 457

页数：12

共 96 条

[1]

Aaltonen Kirsi, 2008, International Journal of Project Management, V26, P509, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.004

[2] Project stakeholder analysis as an environmental interpretation process [J].

Aaltonen, Kirsi .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (02) :165-183

[3] A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects [J].

Aaltonen, Kirsi ;

Kujala, Jaakko .

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2010, 26 (04) :381-397

[4] Response strategies to stakeholder pressures in global projects [J].

Aaltonen, Kirsi ;

Sivonen, Risto .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2009, 27 (02) :131-141

[5]

Achterkamp Marjolein C., 2008, International Journal of Project Management, V26, P749, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.10.001

[6] Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory [J].

Agle, Bradley R. ;

Donaldson, Thomas ;

Freeman, R. Edward ;

Jensen, Michael C. ;

Mitchell, Ronald K. ;

Wood, Donna J. .

BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2008, 18 (02) :153-190

[7]

[Anonymous], 2011, MACAU DAILY TIMES MD

[8] Engaging stakeholders in performance-based building: lessons from the Performance-Based Building (PeBBu) Network [J].

Bakens, W ;

Foliente, G ;

Jasuja, M .

BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2005, 33 (02) :149-158

[9] Successful participation methods for local transport planning [J].

Batheram, M ;

Hardin, J ;

Whitfield, S .

PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-MUNICIPAL ENGINEER, 2005, 158 (01) :9-16

[10] Attaining improved resilience to floods: a proactive multi-stakeholder approach [J].

Bosher, Lee ;

Dainty, Andrew ;

Carrillo, Patricia ;

Glass, Jacqueline ;

Price, Andrew .

DISASTER PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 18 (01) :9-22

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 →