Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes

被引:145
作者
Damstra, Janalt [1 ]
Fourie, Zacharias [1 ]
Slater, James J. R. Huddleston [2 ]
Ren, Yijin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Orthodont, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Acad Ctr Oral Hlth, Dept Oral Hlth Care & Clin Epidemiol, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
SMALLEST DETECTABLE DIFFERENCE; GEOMETRIC ACCURACY; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT; IMAGES; CT; GLASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.016
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
100302 [口腔临床医学];
摘要
Introduction: The aims of this study were to determine the linear accuracy of 3-dimensional surface models derived from a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) dental imaging system and volumetric rendering software and to investigate the influence of voxel resolution on the linear accuracy of CBCT surface models. Methods: Glass sphere markers were fixed on 10 dry mandibles. The mandibles were scanned with 0.40 and 0.25 voxel size resolutions in 3 sessions. Anatomic truth was established with 6 direct digital caliper measurements. The surface models were rendered by a volumetric rendering program, and the CBCT measurements were established as the mean of the 3 measurements. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficients between the physical measurements and the measurements of the CBCT images of 0.40 and 0.25 voxels were all more than 0.99. All CBCT measurements were accurate. There was no difference between the accuracy of the measurements between the 0.40 and 0.25 voxel size groups. The smallest detectable differences of the CBCT measurements were minimal, confirming the accuracy of the CBCT measurement procedure. Conclusions: The measurements on 3-dimensional surface models of 0.25 and 0.40 voxel size data sets made with the 3D eXam CBCT scanner (KaVo Dental GmbH, Bismarckring, Germany) and SimPlant Ortho Pro software (version 2.00, Materialise Dental, Leuven, Belgium) are accurate compared with direct caliper measurements. An increased voxel resolution did not result in greater accuracy of the surface model measurments. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:16.e1-16.e6)
引用
收藏
页码:16.e1 / 16.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine [J].
Ballrick, John W. ;
Palomo, J. Martin ;
Ruch, Edward ;
Amberman, B. Douglas ;
Hans, Mark G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 134 (04) :573-582
[2]
Linear Accuracy of Cone Beam CT Derived 3D Images [J].
Brown, April A. ;
Scarfe, William C. ;
Scheetz, James P. ;
Silveira, Anibal M. ;
Farman, Allan G. .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2009, 79 (01) :150-157
[3]
Geometric accuracy of digital volume tomography and conventional computed tomography [J].
Eggers, G. ;
Klein, J. ;
Welzel, T. ;
Muehling, J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 46 (08) :639-644
[4]
A rare case of a glass foreign body in the parapharyngeal space: pre-operative assessment by contrast-enhanced CT and three-dimensional CT images [J].
Enomoto, K. ;
Nishimura, H. ;
Inohara, H. ;
Murata, J. ;
Horii, A. ;
Doi, K. ;
Kubo, T. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2009, 38 (02) :112-115
[5]
2001 ARRS President's Award - Radiologic differentiation of intraocular glass: Evaluation of imaging techniques, glass types, size, and effect of intraocular hemorrhage [J].
Gor, DM ;
Kirsch, CF ;
Leen, J ;
Turbin, R ;
Von Hagen, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 177 (05) :1199-1203
[6]
From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3-dimensional computed tomography scans [J].
Halazonetis, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2005, 127 (05) :627-637
[7]
Harrell WE., 2006, RADIOGRAPHIC CEPHALO, V2nd, P233
[8]
Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position [J].
Hassan, Bassam ;
van der Stelt, Paul ;
Sanderink, Gerard .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2009, 31 (02) :129-134
[9]
Smallest detectable difference of maximal mouth opening in patients with painfully restricted temporomandibular joint function [J].
Kropmans, T ;
Dijkstra, P ;
Stegenga, B ;
Stewart, R ;
de Bont, L .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2000, 108 (01) :9-13
[10]
Smallest detectable difference in outcome variables related to painful restriction of the temporomandibular joint [J].
Kropmans, TJB ;
Dijkstra, PU ;
Stegenga, B ;
Stewart, R ;
de Bont, LGM .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1999, 78 (03) :784-789