Bacillus thuringiensis subsp kurstaki aerial spray prescriptions for balsam fir stand protection against spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

被引:32
作者
Bauce, E [1 ]
Carisey, N [1 ]
Dupont, A [1 ]
Van Frankenhuyzen, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Fac Foresterie & Geomat, CRBF, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
关键词
Choristoneura fumiferana; Bacillus thuringiensis; Abies balsamea; forest protection; aerial spraying prescriptions;
D O I
10.1603/0022-0493-97.5.1624
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Although commercial formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki (Btk) are being widely used in forest protection against lepidopteran defoliators, optimal application prescriptions have often yet to be worked out in detail. We conducted field experiments over a 6-yr period (1996-2001) in southwestern Quebec to determine application prescriptions for optimal protection of balsam fir, Abies balsamea (L.), healthy stands against the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). At moderate larval densities (<30 larvae per 45-cm branch tip), similar foliage protection was achieved with one or two Btk applications of 30 billion international units per hectare (BIU/ha). When larval densities exceeded 30 larvae per branch tip, two successive applications of 30 BIU/ha significantly increased foliage protection. Whether the second application took place 5 or 10 d after the first spray did not affect treatment efficacy. Increasing the application dosage from 30 to 50 BIU/ha did not lead to better foliage protection against high larval densities, but the current standard dosage of 30 BIU/ha saved more foliage than 15 BIU/ha against moderate populations. The recommended dosage of 30 BIU can be applied in lower application volumes (1.5 liters/ha) by using a high-potency product (20 BIU/Iiter), because we did not observe a reduction in efficacy compared with the application of a lower potency product (12.7 BIU/liter) in 2.37 liters/ha. We also demonstrated that Btk can be applied much earlier in the season without compromising spray efficacy: there was no difference in treatment efficacy of double applications at 30 BIU/ha when the first spray was timed for early third, peak third, or early fourth instars.
引用
收藏
页码:1624 / 1634
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
AGRESTI A., 2019, INTRO CATEGORICAL DA
[2]  
AUGER M, 1993, EXPERTISES ENTOMOLOG
[3]  
Bauce E., 2002, AGR FOREST ENTOMOL, V4, P1
[5]   TRENDS IN THE FREQUENCY, EXTENT, AND SEVERITY OF SPRUCE BUDWORM OUTBREAKS IN EASTERN CANADA [J].
BLAIS, JR .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1983, 13 (04) :539-547
[6]  
BLAIS JR, 1985, P CANUSA SPRUCE BUDW, P49
[7]  
BOULET B, 2001, TORDEUSE BOURGEONS E, P3
[8]  
CARROW JR, 1983, BT SPRUCE BUDWORM 19
[9]  
CARTER N, 1989, PROTECTION SPRAYING
[10]  
CARTER NE, 1988, PROTECTION SPRAYING