Understanding consumer confidence in the safety of food: Its two-dimensional structure and determinants

被引:129
作者
de Jonge, Janneke [1 ]
van Trijp, Hans [1 ]
Renes, Reint Jan [1 ]
Frewer, Lynn [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Marketing & Consumer Behav Grp, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
confidence; food safety; optimism; pessimism; trust;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00917.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Understanding of the determinants of consumer confidence in the safety of food is important if effective risk management and communication are to be developed. In the research reported here, we attempt to understand the roles of consumer trust in actors in the food chain and regulators, consumer recall of food safety incidents, consumer perceptions regarding the safety of particular product groups, personality characteristics, and sociodemographics, as potential determinants of consumer confidence in the safety of food. Consumer confidence in the safety of food was conceptualized as consisting of two distinct dimensions, namely, "optimism" and "pessimism." On the basis of a representative sample of 657 Dutch consumers, structural equation modeling was applied to simultaneously estimate the effect of the determinants on both "optimism" and "pessimism." The results indicated that, to a considerable extent, both optimism and pessimism about the safety of food arise from consumer trust in regulators and actors in the food chain and the perceived safety of meat and fish rather than other product categories. In addition, support was found for the notion that optimism and pessimism are conceptually distinct, as these dimensions of confidence were partly influenced by different determinants. The results of this study imply that consumer confidence in the safety of food could be enhanced by improving both consumer trust in societal actors, and consumer safety perceptions of particular product groups.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 740
页数:12
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[2]  
[Anonymous], OUR FOOD OUR HLTH HL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, TRUST FOOD EUROPE CO
[4]   Risk perception and experience: Hazard personality profiles and individual differences [J].
Barnett, J ;
Breakwell, GM .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2001, 21 (01) :171-177
[5]   Determinants of priority for risk reduction: The role of worry [J].
Baron, J ;
Hershey, JC ;
Kunreuther, H .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2000, 20 (04) :413-427
[6]  
Baumgartner H, 1996, International Journal of Research in Marketing, V13, P139, DOI [10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0, DOI 10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0]
[7]   Trust in food safety in Russia, Denmark and Norway [J].
Berg, L ;
Kjaernes, U ;
Ganskau, E ;
Minina, V ;
Voltchkova, L ;
Halkier, B ;
Holm, L .
EUROPEAN SOCIETIES, 2005, 7 (01) :103-129
[8]   Trust in food in the age of mad cow disease: a comparative study of consumers' evaluation of food safety in Belgium, Britain and Norway [J].
Berg, L .
APPETITE, 2004, 42 (01) :21-32
[9]   Personality correlates of risk perception [J].
Bouyer, M ;
Bagdassarian, S ;
Chaabanne, S ;
Mullet, E .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2001, 21 (03) :457-465
[10]  
Bredahl L., 2001, Journal of Consumer Policy, V24, P23, DOI [10.1023/A:1010950406128, DOI 10.1023/A:1010950406128]