Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in the Netherlands

被引:53
作者
de Kok, Inge M. C. M. [1 ]
van Ballegooijen, Marjolein [1 ]
Habbema, J. Dik F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr, Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2009年 / 101卷 / 15期
关键词
RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS; CERVICAL-CANCER; PARTICLE VACCINE; UNITED-STATES; HPV VACCINATION; HIGH-RISK; EFFICACY; TYPE-18; HEALTH; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djp183
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In the Netherlands, low cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates might limit the cost-effectiveness of vaccination against the human papillomavirus (HPV). We examined the effect on cervical cancer incidence and mortality of adding HPV vaccination to the current Dutch cervical cancer screening situation and calculated the cost-effectiveness. Costs and effects were estimated under favorable assumptions (ie, that HPV vaccination provides lifelong protection against 70% of all cervical cancers, has no side effects, and is administered to all women regardless of their risk of cervical cancer) by using the microsimulation screening analysis (MISCAN) model. The impact of changes in the price of vaccination, number of booster vaccinations, vaccination attendance rate, vaccination efficacy, cervical cancer incidence level, and quality-of-life assumptions was investigated in sensitivity analyses. Using the current price of euro118 per vaccine dose and with discounting of costs and effects at an annual rate of 3%, adding HPV vaccination to the current Dutch screening situation had a cost-effectiveness ratio of euro53 500 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The threshold price per vaccine dose at which the cost-effectiveness of vaccination would correspond to an acceptability threshold of euro20 000 per QALY gained was euro40. With the addition of one or more (up to four) booster vaccinations during a lifetime, this threshold price decreased to euro33 for one booster (to euro16 for four boosters). With a doubling of the cervical cancer incidence level, the cost-effectiveness ratio was euro24 400 per QALY gained and the maximum price per dose at threshold of euro20 000 was euro97. All threshold prices were lower under less favorable effectiveness assumptions. In the Netherlands, HPV vaccination is not cost-effective even under favorable assumptions. To become cost-effective, the vaccine price would have to be decreased considerably, depending on the effectiveness of the vaccine.
引用
收藏
页码:1083 / 1092
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2004, GLOBOCAN 2002 CANC I
  • [2] Natural history and screening model for high-risk human papillomavirus infection, neoplasia and cervical cancer in the Netherlands
    Berkhof, J
    de Bruijne, MC
    Zielinski, GD
    Meijer, CJLM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 115 (02) : 268 - 275
  • [3] The potential cost-effectiveness of prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccines in Canada
    Brisson, Marc
    Van de Velde, Nicolas
    De Wals, Philippe
    Boily, Marie-Claude
    [J]. VACCINE, 2007, 25 (29) : 5399 - 5408
  • [4] *CENTR OFF STAT, 1994, MORT CAUS DEATH A A1
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination in the United States
    Chesson, Harrell W.
    Ekwueme, Donatus U.
    Saraiya, Mona
    Markowitz, Lauri E.
    [J]. EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 14 (02) : 244 - 251
  • [6] HPV type-distribution in women with and without cervical neoplastic diseases
    Clifford, Gary
    Franceschi, Silvia
    Diaz, Mireia
    Munoz, Nubia
    Villa, Luisa Lina
    [J]. VACCINE, 2006, 24 : 26 - 34
  • [7] *COLL ZORGV, 1999, RICHTL FARM EC OND G
  • [8] *COLL ZORGV, 2006, RICHTL FARM EC OND G
  • [9] HPV16/18 vaccination to prevent cervical cancer in The Netherlands: Model-based cost-effectiveness
    Coupe, Veerle M. H.
    van Ginkel, Joost
    de Melker, Hester E.
    Snijders, Peter J. F.
    Meijer, Chris J. L. M.
    Berkhof, Johannes
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 124 (04) : 970 - 978
  • [10] Drummond MF., 2015, Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes