The Effect of Preoperative Heart Rate and Anxiety on the Propofol Dose Required for Loss of Consciousness

被引:36
作者
Gras, Severine [1 ]
Servin, Frederique [1 ]
Bedairia, Ennoufous [1 ]
Montravers, Philippe [1 ]
Desmonts, Jean-Marie [1 ]
Longrois, Dan [1 ]
Guglielminotti, Jean [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Bichat Claude Bernard, AP HP, Dept Anesthesie & Reanimat Chirurg, F-75018 Paris, France
关键词
INDUCTION; ANESTHESIA; INFUSION; DETERMINANT; STATE; POWER;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c5bd11
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Conflicting results have been reported on the effect of anxiety on the propofol dose required for inducing loss of consciousness (LOC). The hemodynamic effects of anxiety, increased heart rate (HR), and cardiac output may account for these discrepancies. We therefore designed this study to address, first, the effect of perioperative HR on propofol dose required for LOC and, second, the effect of perioperative anxiety on HR. METHODS: Forty-five ASA physical status I-II female patients undergoing gynecological surgery were studied. Anxiety was assessed in the operating room with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)-state Spielberger scale (situational anxiety). After HR recording, anesthesia was induced with a 200-mL/h 1% propofol infusion with the Base Primea (R) pump (Fresenius-Vial, Brezins, France) until LOC. The propofol dose was recorded at the time of LOC. Relationships between STAI-state and HR versus propofol dose at LOC were tested with the Spearman test with a P value of 0.01. RESULTS: A significant relationship was observed between HR and propofol dose at LOC (rho = 0.487, P = 0.0012) but not between STAI-state and propofol dose (rho = 0.330, P 0.0306). However, a significant relationship was observed between STAI-state and HR (rho = 0.462 and P = 0.0054). CONCLUSION: Increased perioperative HR is associated with increased propofol dose required for LOC. Perioperative anxiety accounts for increased HR. (Anesth Analg 2010;110:89-93)
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 93
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   The determinants of propofol induction of anesthesia dose [J].
Adachi, YU ;
Watanabe, K ;
Higuchi, H ;
Satoh, T .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 92 (03) :656-661
[2]   Using front-end kinetics to optimize target-controlled drug infusions [J].
Avram, MJ ;
Krejcie, TC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 99 (05) :1078-1086
[3]   CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS IN ANXIETY - EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES IN CONSCIOUS DOG [J].
BERGAMASCHI, M ;
LONGONI, AM .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1973, 86 (03) :385-394
[4]   PHARMACOKINETIC MODEL SELECTION FOR TARGET CONTROLLED INFUSIONS OF PROPOFOL - ASSESSMENT OF 3 PARAMETER SETS [J].
COETZEE, JF ;
GLEN, JB ;
WIUM, CA ;
BOSHOFF, L .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 82 (06) :1328-1345
[5]   Induction speed is not a determinant of propofol pharmacodynamics [J].
Doufas, AG ;
Bakhshandeh, M ;
Bjorksten, AR ;
Shafer, SL ;
Sessler, DI .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 101 (05) :1112-1121
[6]   Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression [J].
Dupont, WD ;
Plummer, WD .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1998, 19 (06) :589-601
[7]   MEASUREMENT OF PLASMA-CATECHOLAMINE CONCENTRATIONS - AN ASSESSMENT OF ANXIETY [J].
FELL, D ;
DERBYSHIRE, DR ;
MAILE, CJD ;
LARSSON, IM ;
ELLIS, R ;
ACHOLA, KJ ;
SMITH, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1985, 57 (08) :770-774
[8]   Both clonidine and metoprolol modify anesthetic depth indicators and reduce intraoperative propofol requirement [J].
Ghosh, Indranil ;
Bithal, Parmod K. ;
Dash, Hari H. ;
Chaturvedi, Arvind ;
Prabhakar, Hemanshu .
JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2008, 22 (02) :131-134
[9]   Hemodynamic profile of stress-induced anticipation and recovery [J].
Gregg, ME ;
James, JE ;
Matyas, TA ;
Thorsteinsson, EB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 34 (02) :147-162
[10]  
Guyton A.C., 2000, TXB MED PHYSL, V10th, P210