Long-term outcome after angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis compared with medical treatment in the carotid and vertebral artery transluminal angioplasty study (CAVATAS) - A randomized trial

被引:135
作者
Coward, Lucy J.
McCabe, Dominick J. H.
Ederle, Joerg
Featherstone, Roland L.
Clifton, Andrew
Brown, Martin M.
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Neurol, Stroke Res Grp, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Adelaide & Meath Hosp, Dept Neurol, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Univ Dublin Trinity Coll, Natl Childrens Hosp, Dublin 2, Ireland
[4] Univ London St Georges Hosp, Dept Neuroradiol, London SW17 0RE, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
angioplasty; randomized trial; stents; stroke prevention; vertebral artery stenosis;
D O I
10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.471862
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose - The long-term outcome of endovascular intervention compared with best medical management of patients with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis is uncertain. We therefore compared these treatments in a randomized trial with long-term follow-up. Methods - In the international, multicenter Carotid And Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study, 16 patients with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis were randomized in equal proportions to receive endovascular therapy ( balloon angioplasty or stenting) or best medical treatment alone. An independent neurologist followed up the patients for as long as 8 years. Results - Endovascular intervention was technically successful in all 8 patients, but 2 patients experienced transient ischemic attack at the time of endovascular treatment. There were no deaths or strokes in any arterial territory within the first 30 days. During a mean follow-up period of 4.7 years, no patient in either treatment group experienced a vertebrobasilar territory stroke, but 3 patients in each treatment arm died of myocardial infarction or carotid territory stroke, and 1 endovascular patient had a nonfatal carotid territory stroke. Conclusions - Patients with vertebral artery stenosis were more likely to have carotid territory stroke and myocardial infarction during follow-up than have recurrent vertebrobasilar stroke. The trial failed to show a benefit of endovascular treatment of vertebral artery stenosis, but the numbers of patients included was small. Larger randomized trials are required to determine whether vertebral artery stenting is justified in patients at higher risk of vertebrobasilar stroke. Treatment of patients with vertebral artery stenosis should focus on global reduction of vascular risk, including prevention of carotid territory stroke and myocardial infarction.
引用
收藏
页码:1526 / 1530
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   A reappraisal of angioplasty and stenting for the treatment of vertebral origin stenosis [J].
Albuquerque, FC ;
Fiorella, D ;
Han, P ;
Spetzler, RF ;
McDougall, CG .
NEUROSURGERY, 2003, 53 (03) :607-614
[2]   INTRACRANIAL VERTEBRAL ENDARTERECTOMY [J].
AUSMAN, JI ;
DIAZ, FG ;
SADASIVAN, B ;
DUJOVNY, M .
NEUROSURGERY, 1990, 26 (03) :465-471
[3]  
Barakate MS, 2001, J ENDOVASC THER, V8, P558, DOI 10.1583/1545-1550(2001)008<0558:AASITP>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]  
Berguer R, 2000, VASCULAR SURG, P1823
[6]   Risk of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic vertebrobasilar stenosis undergoing surgical procedures [J].
Blacker, DJ ;
Flemming, KD ;
Wijdicks, EFM .
STROKE, 2003, 34 (11) :2659-2663
[7]  
Brown MM, 2001, LANCET, V357, P1729
[8]   Extracranial vertebral artery stent placement: in-hospital and follow-up results [J].
Chastain, HD ;
Campbell, MS ;
Iyer, S ;
Roubin, GS ;
Vitek, J ;
Mathur, A ;
Al-Mubarak, NA ;
Terry, JB ;
Yates, V ;
Kretzer, K ;
Alred, D ;
Gomez, CR .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 91 (04) :547-552
[9]  
Chiras J, 2002, REV NEUROL-FRANCE, V158, P51
[10]   Vertebral artery origin angioplasty and primary stenting: safety and restenosis rates in a prospective series [J].
Cloud, GC ;
Crawley, F ;
Clifton, A ;
McCabe, DJH ;
Brown, MM ;
Markus, HS .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 74 (05) :586-590