Quality of life in operable colon cancer patients receiving oral compared with intravenous chemotherapy: Results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Trial C-06

被引:55
作者
Kopec, Jacek A.
Yothers, Greg
Ganz, Patricia A.
Land, Stephanie R.
Cecchini, Reena S.
Wieand, H. Samuel
Lembersky, Barry C.
Wolmark, Norman
机构
[1] Natl Surg Adjuvant Breast & Bowel Project Operat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Magee Womens Hosp, Ctr Canc, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[7] Allegheny Gen Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2597
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose We compared health-related quality of life (HRQL), symptoms, and convenience of care (COC) in patients with stage II/III carcinoma of the colon who received either oral uracil/ftorafur (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV) or standard intravenous (IV) fluorouracil (FU) plus LV as adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and Methods We measured HRQL with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) questionnaire, Short Form-36 Vitality Scale (SF-36), and a Quality of Life Rating Scale (QLRS) at baseline, once during chemotherapy, and at 1 year. We used the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS) and treatment-specific Symptom Checklist (SCL) to assess symptoms and a modified Burden of Care form to assess COC at baseline, on day 1 of each treatment cycle, and at 1 year. Repeated measures analyses controlling for demographic variables and baseline scores were used for statistical comparisons. Results The study accrued 1,608 patients, 803 to the FU arm and 805 to the UFT arm. There were no differences between the arms in overall FACT-C scores, FACT-C scores within the subscales of colon-specific, physical, emotional, social, and functional health, or QLRS scores. Patients taking UFT reported substantially higher COC. Statistically significant but small differences were observed for SF-36, favoring FU, and for SDS and SCL, both favoring UFT. Conclusion Patients perceive adjuvant treatment with UFT + LV as more convenient than standard IV treatment with FU + LV. Both regimens are well tolerated and do not differ in their impact on HRQL.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 430
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Patient preference and pharmacokinetics of oral modulated UFT versus intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin:: a randomised crossover trial in advanced colorectal cancer [J].
Borner, MM ;
Schöffski, P ;
de Wit, R ;
Caponigro, F ;
Comella, G ;
Sulkes, A ;
Greim, G ;
Peters, GJ ;
van der Born, K ;
Wanders, J ;
de Boer, RF ;
Martin, C ;
Fumoleau, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 (03) :349-358
[2]   Randomized comparative study of tegafur/uracil and oral leucovorin versus parenteral fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Carmichael, J ;
Popiela, T ;
Radstone, D ;
Falk, S ;
Borner, M ;
Oza, A ;
Skovsgaard, T ;
Munier, S ;
Martin, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (17) :3617-3627
[3]   THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CANCER-THERAPY SCALE - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE GENERAL MEASURE [J].
CELLA, DF ;
TULSKY, DS ;
GRAY, G ;
SARAFIAN, B ;
LINN, E ;
BONOMI, A ;
SILBERMAN, M ;
YELLEN, SB ;
WINICOUR, P ;
BRANNON, J ;
ECKBERG, K ;
LLOYD, S ;
PURL, S ;
BLENDOWSKI, C ;
GOODMAN, M ;
BARNICLE, M ;
STEWART, I ;
MCHALE, M ;
BONOMI, P ;
KAPLAN, E ;
TAYLOR, S ;
THOMAS, CR ;
HARRIS, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (03) :570-579
[4]   Is a single-item visual analogue scale as valid, reliable and responsive as multi-item scales in measuring quality of life? [J].
de Boer, AGEM ;
van Lanschot, JJB ;
Stalmeier, PFM ;
van Sandick, JW ;
Hulscher, JBF ;
de Haes, JCJM ;
Sprangers, MAG .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (02) :311-320
[5]   Multicenter phase III study of uracil/tegafur and oral leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Douillard, JY ;
Hoff, PM ;
Skillings, JR ;
Eisenberg, P ;
Davidson, N ;
Harper, P ;
Vincent, MD ;
Lembersky, BC ;
Thompson, S ;
Maniero, A ;
Benner, SE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (17) :3605-3616
[6]   PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS OF SYMPTOM DISTRESS IN 2 CANCER-PATIENT POPULATIONS - EVALUATION OF A MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT [J].
HOLMES, S .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1991, 16 (04) :439-446
[7]   Oral tegafur-uracil plus folinic acid versus intravenous 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid as adjuvant chemotherapy of colon cancer [J].
Kim, DJ ;
Kim, TI ;
Suh, JH ;
Cho, YS ;
Shin, SK ;
Kang, JK ;
Kim, NK ;
Kim, WH .
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 44 (04) :665-675
[8]  
LABIANCA R, 1995, LANCET, V345, P939
[9]   Oral uracil and tegafur plus leucovorin compared with intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin in stage II and III carcinoma of the colon: Results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol C-06 [J].
Lembersky, BC ;
Wieand, HS ;
Petrelli, NJ ;
O'Connell, MJ ;
Colangelo, LH ;
Smith, RE ;
Seay, TE ;
Giguere, JK ;
Marshall, ME ;
Jacobs, AD ;
Colman, LK ;
Soran, A ;
Yothers, G ;
Wolmark, N .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (13) :2059-2064
[10]  
Lima APR, 2005, EUR J CANCER CARE, V14, P151