What factors influence the results of ACT when the indication limits are exceeded?

被引:5
作者
Andereya, S [1 ]
Mumme, T [1 ]
Müller-Rath, R [1 ]
Schneider, U [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum, Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Orthopad Klin, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE | 2004年 / 142卷 / 06期
关键词
autologous chondrocyte transplantation; indication limits; adjacent cartilage; cell quality;
D O I
10.1055/s-2004-832446
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: The present study evaluates the results of ACT at the knee joint with transgression of the usual spectrum of indications and points out the possible limits of the method. Methods: In 20 of a total of 71 patients the indication limits of ACT were exceeded. The clinical follow-up over two years was related to the localisation, size, adjacent cartilage, previous and additional operations and the quality of the transplanted chondrocytes. Results: The average patient age at time of operation was 41.1 years (24 to 55 years). The average defect size was 7.9 cm(2) (3.75 to 14 cm(2)). In the analysed group outside of the indication limits of ACT half of the patients showed good or excellent results at clinical follow-up after 2 years. 10 patients. however. assessed the clinical situation as fair or poor. Within this group 5 patients showed a minimum of two lesions. In 6 patients the treated defect was not completely surrounded by an adjacent cartilage shoulder. In 7 cases the meniscus at the site of the lesion had been partially removed in a previous operation and osteoarthrosis or kissing lesions were detected in 4 cases. The persistent good cell quality had no negative influence on the postoperative results. Conclusion: The results after ACT are influenced by the adjacent cartilage shoulder, kissing lesions, previous meniscectomy and osteoarthrosis. This may limit the indications of the method.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 658
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
*ACT, 2002, Z ORTHOP, V140, P132
[2]   LATE DEGENERATIVE CHANGES AFTER MENISCECTOMY - FACTORS AFFECTING THE KNEE AFTER OPERATION [J].
ALLEN, PR ;
DENHAM, RA ;
SWAN, AV .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1984, 66 (05) :666-671
[3]  
Anders S, 2001, ORTHOPADE, V30, P866, DOI 10.1007/s001320170023
[4]   A prospective, randomised comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee [J].
Bentley, G ;
Biant, LC ;
Carrington, RWJ ;
Akmal, M ;
Goldberg, A ;
Williams, AM ;
Skinner, JA ;
Pringle, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2003, 85B (02) :223-230
[5]   Histological evaluation of chondral defects after autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee [J].
Briggs, TWR ;
Mahroof, S ;
David, LA ;
Flannelly, DJ ;
Pringle, J ;
Bayliss, M .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2003, 85B (07) :1077-1083
[6]   TREATMENT OF DEEP CARTILAGE DEFECTS IN THE KNEE WITH AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE TRANSPLANTATION [J].
BRITTBERG, M ;
LINDAHL, A ;
NILSSON, A ;
OHLSSON, C ;
ISAKSSON, O ;
PETERSON, L .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (14) :889-895
[7]   Magnetic resonance imaging appearance of cartilage repair in the knee [J].
Brown, WE ;
Potter, HG ;
Marx, RG ;
Wickiewicz, TL ;
Warren, RF .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (422) :214-223
[8]  
Cicuttini FM, 2002, J RHEUMATOL, V29, P1954
[9]   Cartilage injuries: A review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies [J].
Curl, WW ;
Krome, J ;
Gordon, ES ;
Rushing, J ;
Smith, BP ;
Poehling, GG .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 1997, 13 (04) :456-460
[10]  
Erggelet C, 2000, ZBL CHIR, V125, P516