Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?

被引:61
作者
Amrani, Golan [1 ]
Gefen, Amit [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Biomed Engn, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
endotracheal tube; finite element modelling; medical device-related pressure ulcer; pressure injury; DRESSINGS; PREVENTION; INJURIES; TISSUES; EFFICACY; IMPACT; SKIN;
D O I
10.1111/iwj.13267
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100227 [皮肤病学];
摘要
The use of an endotracheal tube (ETT), which is required for any mechanical ventilation procedure, involves an inherent risk for facial skin, lip, and mucosal pressure ulcers. The ETT is one of the most common devices associated with medical device-related pressure ulcers (MDRPUs) among surgical and intensive care unit patients. In the present work, we investigated, for the first time in the literature, the biomechanical effects of the presence and positioning of an ETT in the mouth on lip, mucosal and surrounding facial skin loads. Using two anatomically realistic finite element model variants, two ETT locations were simulated and compared, at the centre versus the corner of the mouth. Our study shows that a central location of the ETT inflicted greater lip and mucosal stress values, but a corner location caused a more widespread and diffused lip, mucosal and facial skin stress exposure. Accordingly, we cannot recommend a "safer" location for ETTs in the mouth; additional preventative measures such as dedicated dressing materials or special cushioning pads applied prophylactically, should be developed to protect from MDRPUs associated with ETT usage. The present modelling framework can be used to study the biomechanical efficacy of such protective technologies, and can therefore aid in the prevention of ETT-caused MDRPUs.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 276
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]
[Anonymous], VIS HUM PROJ GALL
[2]
[Anonymous], 2017, World Counc Enteros Ther J, DOI DOI 10.3316/INFORMIT.705144608520918
[3]
[Anonymous], 2014, INT PRESS ULC GUID
[4]
Bioengineering considerations in the prevention of medical device-related pressure ulcers [J].
Bader, D. L. ;
Worsley, P. R. ;
Gefen, A. .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2019, 67 :70-77
[5]
Medical device-related pressure injuries: An exploratory descriptive study in an acute tertiary hospital in Australia [J].
Barakat-Johnson, Michelle ;
Barnett, Catherine ;
Wand, Timothy ;
White, Kathryn .
JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, 2017, 26 (04) :246-253
[6]
Comparison of two endotracheal tube securement techniques on unplanned extubation, oral mucosa, and facial skin integrity [J].
Barnason, S ;
Graham, J ;
Wild, C ;
Jensen, LB ;
Rasmussen, D ;
Schulz, P ;
Woods, S ;
Carder, B .
HEART & LUNG, 1998, 27 (06) :409-417
[7]
Use of wound dressings to enhance prevention of pressure ulcers caused by medical devices [J].
Black, Joyce ;
Alves, Paulo ;
Brindle, Christopher Tod ;
Dealey, Carol ;
Santamaria, Nick ;
Call, Evan ;
Clark, Michael .
INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2015, 12 (03) :322-327
[8]
Medical device-related pressure ulcers [J].
Black, Joyce M. ;
Kalowes, Peggy .
CHRONIC WOUND CARE MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2016, 3 :91-99
[9]
Dressings cut to shape alleviate facial tissue loads while using an oxygen mask [J].
Cohen, Lea Peko ;
Ovadia-Blechman, Zehava ;
Hoffer, Oshrit ;
Gefen, Amit .
INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2019, 16 (03) :813-826
[10]
Evidence-Based Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in the Intensive Care Unit [J].
Cooper, Karen L. .
CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2013, 33 (06) :57-66