Diagnostic value of sonography in patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome -: A prospective study

被引:190
作者
Ziswiler, HR
Reichenbach, S
Vögelin, E
Bachmann, LM
Villiger, PM
Jüni, P
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Dept Social & Prevent Med, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
来源
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM | 2005年 / 52卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1002/art.20723
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objective. To determine the diagnostic value of sonography in patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods. We conducted a prospective study of 110 wrists in 74 consecutive patients with suspected CTS who had been referred to a tertiary care center. We determined the largest cross-sectional area of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel. Because of the lack of a universally accepted reference standard, we first examined the association of sonography with nerve conduction. Then, we compared sonography with a reference standard based on the combination of nerve conduction studies and signs and symptoms. Sonography and reference standard tests were performed independently and interpreted under blinded conditions. Based on a fitted receiver operating characteristic curve, we estimated likelihood ratios (LRs) and posttest probabilities for different cutoffs. Results. There was a high concordance between sonography and nerve conduction. Based on the combined reference standard, a cutoff of 10 mm(2) resulted in approximately equal sensitivity and specificity, but only moderate LRs. A cutoff of <8 mm(2) had satisfactory power to rule out CTS: the fitted-negative LR was 0.13. Conversely, a cutoff of >= 12 mm(2) had excellent power to rule in CTS, with a fitted-positive LR of 19.9. For nerves >= 12 mm(2) and a pretest probability of 70% expected in patients with suspected CTS in tertiary care, we found a posttest probability of CTS of 98%. Conclusion. Depending on setting and purpose, different cutoff values for the largest cross-sectional area may be used to accurately rule in or rule out CTS. Using sonography as a first-line test may cost-effectively reduce the number of nerve conduction studies in patients with suspected CTS. A large-scale, randomized controlled trial is required to determine the effects of sonography on clinical outcomes, the number of nerve conduction studies performed, and the total cost.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 311
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1988, CLIN CHEM
[2]
Diagnostic properties of nerve conduction tests in population-based carpal tunnel syndrome [J].
Atroshi, I ;
Gummesson, C ;
Johnsson, R ;
Ornstein, E .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2003, 4 (1) :1-7
[3]
Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population [J].
Atroshi, I ;
Gummesson, C ;
Johnssson, R ;
Ornstein, E ;
Ranstam, J ;
Rosén, I .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (02) :153-158
[4]
Commentary: Black and white or shades of grey? [J].
Battaglia, M ;
Pewsner, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 32 (02) :314-315
[5]
Randomised comparisons of medical tests: sometimes invalid, not always efficient [J].
Bossuyt, PMM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Mol, BWJ .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9244) :1844-1847
[6]
Breiman L., 1993, CLASSIFICATION REGRE
[7]
CARPAL-TUNNEL SYNDROME - DIAGNOSIS WITH HIGH-RESOLUTION SONOGRAPHY [J].
BUCHBERGER, W ;
JUDMAIER, W ;
BIRBAMER, G ;
LENER, M ;
SCHMIDAUER, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1992, 159 (04) :793-798
[8]
A grey zone for quantitative diagnostic and screening tests [J].
Coste, J ;
Pouchot, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 32 (02) :304-313
[9]
Does this patient have carpal tunnel syndrome? [J].
D'Arcy, CA ;
McGee, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (23) :3110-3117
[10]
Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome [J].
Duncan, I ;
Sullivan, P ;
Lomas, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (03) :681-684