Ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) sequences differentiate Anopheles funestus and An. rivulorum, and uncover a cryptic taxon

被引:69
作者
Hackett, BJ
Gimnig, J
Guelbeogo, W
Costantini, C
Koekemoer, LL
Coetzee, M
Collins, FH
Besansky, NJ
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Biol Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Parasit Dis, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Kenya Med Res Inst, Kisumu, Kenya
[4] Ctr Natl Lutte Paludisme, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
[5] Univ La Sapienza, Ist Parassitol, Rome, Italy
[6] S African Inst Med Res, Sch Pathol, Dept Trop Dis, ZA-2000 Johannesburg, South Africa
[7] Univ Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
关键词
Anopheles funestus; Anopheles rivulorum; cryptic species; molecular taxonomy; ribosomal DNA;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2583.2000.00198.x
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Differentiation among the closely related Afrotropical species comprising the Funestus Group is difficult by traditional taxonomic measures. Anopheles rivulorum is the second most abundant and widespread species in the Funestus Group, and is occasionally collected indoors along with the dominant member and major malaria vector, An. funestus. The prospect of misidentification of An. rivulorum as An. funestus prompted the development of a rapid, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method for identifying these two species. The ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) was amplified from thirty-five specimens of An. rivulorum collected from the extremes of its range: Eastern Africa (Kenya), Southern Africa (South Africa) and Western Africa (Burkina Faso). The ITS2 region of An. rivulorum (approximate to 380 bp) is sufficiently different in size from the ITS2 of An. funestus (approximate to 700 bp) that these species can be distinguished by agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products without further manipulation. Comparison of the An. rivulorum and An. funestus ITS2 nucleotide sequences revealed such extensive divergence that meaningful alignment was impossible, except for a 25 bp island near the 5' end. Intraspecific sequence comparisons revealed no variation among An. rivulorum individuals collected from the same country. However, sequence divergence was 2% between specimens from South Africa and Kenya, and nearly tenfold higher (approximate to 19%) between specimens from Burkina Faso and either South Africa or Kenya, an unprecedented level of intraspecific ITS2 divergence in Anopheles. Taken together, these data suggest that the Burkina Faso sample is not An. rivulorum, but rather a cryptic taxon within the Funestus Group.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 374
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   DNA PROBES FOR IDENTIFYING THE MEMBERS OF THE ANOPHELES PUNCTULATUS COMPLEX IN PAPUA-NEW-GUINEA [J].
BEEBE, NW ;
FOLEY, DH ;
SAUL, A ;
COOPER, L ;
BRYAN, JH ;
BURKOT, TR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 1994, 50 (02) :229-234
[2]   A review of the use of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) to differentiate among cryptic Anopheles species [J].
Collins, FH ;
Paskewitz, SM .
INSECT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1996, 5 (01) :1-9
[3]   A RIBOSOMAL-RNA GENE PROBE DIFFERENTIATES MEMBER SPECIES OF THE ANOPHELES-GAMBIAE COMPLEX [J].
COLLINS, FH ;
MENDEZ, MA ;
RASMUSSEN, MO ;
MEHAFFEY, PC ;
BESANSKY, NJ ;
FINNERTY, V .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 1987, 37 (01) :37-41
[4]  
COLUZZI M, 1970, Miscellaneous Publications of the Entomological Society of America, V7, P63
[5]   Polymerase chain reaction species diagnostic assay for Anopheles quadrimaculatus cryptic species (Diptera: Culicidae) based on ribosomal DNA ITS2 sequences [J].
Cornel, AJ ;
Porter, CH ;
Collins, FH .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1996, 33 (01) :109-116
[6]  
*GEN COMP GROUP, 1997, PROGR MAN GCG PACK V
[7]  
GILLIES M. T., 1960, BULL ENT RES, V51, P243, DOI 10.1017/S0007485300057953
[8]  
Gillies M. T., 1968, ANOPHELINAE AFRICA S
[9]  
Gillies MT, 1987, ANOPHELINAE AFRICA S
[10]   REVIEW OF THE INTERNAL CLASSIFICATION OF THE GENUS ANOPHELES (DIPTERA, CULICIDAE) - THE FOUNDATION FOR COMPARATIVE SYSTEMATICS AND PHYLOGENETIC RESEARCH [J].
HARBACH, RE .
BULLETIN OF ENTOMOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1994, 84 (03) :331-342