The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years

被引:2204
作者
Cella, David
Yount, Susan
Rothrock, Nan
Gershon, Richard
Cook, Karon
Reeve, Bryce
Ader, Deborah
Fries, James F.
Bruce, Bonnie
Rose, Mattias
机构
[1] Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Ctr Outcomes Res & Educ, Evanston, IL 60201 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] NCI, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Samueli Inst, Alexandria, VA USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[6] Hlth Assessment Lab, Boston, MA USA
关键词
outcomes; patient reported outcomes; quality of life; health-related quality of life;
D O I
10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Roadmap initiative (www.nihpromis.org) is a 5-year cooperative group program of research designed to develop, validate, and standardize item banks to measure patient-reported outcomes (PROs) relevant across common medical conditions. In this article, we will summarize the organization and scientific activity of the PROMIS network during its first 2 years. Design: The network consists of 6 primary research sites (PRSs), a statistical coordinating center (SCC), and NIH research scientists. Governed by a steering committee, the network is organized into functional subcommittees and working groups. In the first year, we created an item library and activated 3 interacting protocols: Domain Mapping, Archival Data Analysis, and Qualitative Item Review (QIR). In the second year, we developed and initiated testing of item banks covering 5 broad domains of self-reported health. Results: The domain mapping process is built on the World Health Organization (WHO) framework of physical, mental, and social health. From this framework, pain, fatigue, emotional distress, physical functioning, social role participation, and global health perceptions were selected for the first wave of testing. Item response theory (IRT)-based analysis of I I large datasets supplemented and informed item-level qualitative review of nearly 7000 items from available PRO measures in the item library. Items were selected for rewriting or creation with further detailed review before the first round of testing in the general population and target patient populations. Conclusions: The NIH PROMIS network derived a consensus-based framework for self-reported health, systematically reviewed available instruments and datasets that address the initial PROMIS domains. Qualitative item research led to the first wave of network testing which began in the second year.
引用
收藏
页码:S3 / S11
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Incidence of cardiovascular disease in older Americans: The Cardiovascular Health Study [J].
Arnold, AM ;
Psaty, BM ;
Kuller, LH ;
Burke, GL ;
Manolio, TA ;
Fried, LP ;
Robbins, JA ;
Kronmal, RA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2005, 53 (02) :211-218
[2]   Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches:: An application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT™) [J].
Bjorner, JB ;
Kosinski, M ;
Ware, JE .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (08) :913-933
[3]   Fatigue in cancer patients compared with fatigue in the general United States population [J].
Cella, D ;
Lai, JS ;
Chang, CH ;
Peterman, A ;
Slavin, M .
CANCER, 2002, 94 (02) :528-538
[4]  
Chang CH, 1997, PHYS MED REHABIL STA, V11, P397
[5]  
CHEN WH, 2006, 13 ANN M INT SOC QUA
[6]  
CHOPPIN B, 1981, ISSUES EVALUATION AC
[7]  
CHOPPIN B, 1978, RES PROGR SERIES, V1
[8]   Evaluation of item candidates - The PROMIS qualitative item review [J].
DeWalt, Darren A. ;
Rothrock, Nan ;
Yount, Susan ;
Stone, Arthur A. .
MEDICAL CARE, 2007, 45 (05) :S12-S21
[9]  
Fries JF, 2005, CLIN EXP RHEUMATOL, V23, pS53
[10]  
GASTON M, 1987, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V8, pS131