A comparison of the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of ondansetron versus droperidol as antiemetics for elective outpatient surgical procedures

被引:135
作者
Fortney, JT
Gan, TJ
Graczyk, S
Wetchler, B
Melson, T
Khalil, S
McKenzie, R
Parrillo, S
Glass, PSA
Moote, C
Wermeling, D
Parasuraman, TV
Duncan, B
Creed, MR
Amoroso, M
Belo, S
Bowie, MB
Buckley, N
Cheng, E
Chung, F
Clayborn, L
Coda, B
Conlay, L
Cosman, S
Duncalf, D
Fanciullo, G
Fortney, J
Freid, E
Graczyk, SG
Graf, G
Gratz, I
Greenberg, C
Hall, R
Haynes, G
Kallar, S
Kataria, B
Khalil, S
Knox, D
Koehntop, DE
Levy, L
Lucas, S
Lui, A
Maltby, R
McKenzie, R
Melson, T
Miguel, R
Moote, C
O'Hara, D
Pavlin, J
Rung, G
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Baptist Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Columbia, SC USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Anesthesiol, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Anesthesia Consultants Shoals, Muscle Shoals, AL USA
[5] Univ Texas, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Houston, TX USA
[6] Magee Womens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[7] Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, London, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Kentucky, Dept Anesthesiol, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[9] Glaxo Wellcome Inc, Div Med Affairs, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199804000-00011
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Two identical, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies enrolled 2061 adult surgical outpatients at high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) to compare TV ondansetron 4 mg with droperidol 0.625 mg and droperidol 1.25 mg for the prevention of PONV. The antiemetic drugs or placebo were administered TV 20 min before the induction of anesthesia with a barbiturate compound, followed by maintenance with N2O/isoflurane/enflurane. Nausea, emetic episodes, adverse events, and patient satisfaction were analyzed for the 0 to 2 h and 0 to 24 h postoperative periods. In the 0 to 2 h postoperative period, there was a complete response (no emesis or rescue antiemetic) in 46% of subjects given placebo (P < 0.05 versus antiemetic groups), in 62% given ondansetron, in 63% given droperidol 0.625 mg, and in 69% given droperidol 1.25 mg (P < 0.05 versus ondansetron). In the 0 to 24-h postoperative period, there were no significant differences in complete response between the ondansetron and droperidol 0.625 or 1.25 mg groups; all groups remained superior to placebo. The proportion of patients without nausea during the 0 to 24 h postoperative period was greater in the antiemetic groups compared with the placebo group; however, droperidol 1.25 mg was more effective than ondansetron 4 mg or droperidol 0.625 mg (43% vs 29% or 29%, respectively). Headache incidence was higher in the ondansetron group compared with either droperidol group. Patient satisfaction scores did not differ significantly among antiemetic treatment groups, although all were superior to placebo. In conclusion, all antiemetic treatment regimens were superior to placebo for the prevention of PONV in the immediate postoperative period; however, droperidol 1.25 mg was more efficacious than ondansetron during the early recovery period (0-2 h). There were no significant differences between ondansetron and either droperidol dose for emesis prevention during the 0 to 24 h postoperative period. Implications: More than 2000 patients at high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting were given either placebo, ondansetron 1 mg, or droperidol 0.625 mg or 1.25 mg IV before the administration of general anesthesia. After surgery, the incidence of nausea, vomiting, medication side effects, and patient satisfaction were evaluated for 24 h. Droperidol 0.625 or 1.25 mg IV compared favorably with ondansetron 4 mg IV for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after ambulatory surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 738
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
ALON E, 1992, ANESTH ANALG, V75, P561
[2]  
BURNS K, 1982, INT ANESTHESIOLOGY C, V20
[3]   THE EFFICACY OF PROPHYLACTIC ONDANSETRON, DROPERIDOL, PERPHENAZINE, AND METOCLOPRAMIDE IN THE PREVENTION OF NAUSEA AND VOMITING AFTER MAJOR GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY [J].
DESILVA, PHDP ;
DARVISH, AH ;
MCDONALD, SM ;
CRONIN, MK ;
CLARK, K .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (01) :139-143
[4]   DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF ONDANSETRON, DROPERIDOL AND SALINE IN THE PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING [J].
GAN, TJ ;
COLLIS, R ;
HETREED, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 72 (05) :544-547
[5]   Double-blind, randomized comparison of ondansetron and intraoperative propofol to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting [J].
Gan, TJ ;
Ginsberg, B ;
Grant, AP ;
Glass, PSA .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (05) :1036-1042
[6]   COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF ADMINISTERING DROPERIDOL IN PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA IN THE PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING [J].
GAN, TJ ;
ALEXANDER, R ;
FENNELLY, M ;
RUBIN, AP .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 80 (01) :81-85
[7]   UNANTICIPATED ADMISSION TO THE HOSPITAL FOLLOWING AMBULATORY SURGERY [J].
GOLD, BS ;
KITZ, DS ;
LECKY, JH ;
NEUHAUS, JM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 262 (21) :3008-3010
[8]   COMPARISON OF ONDANSETRON AND DROPERIDOL IN THE PREVENTION OF NAUSEA AND VOMITING AFTER INPATIENT MINOR GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY [J].
GROND, S ;
LYNCH, J ;
DIEFENBACH, C ;
ALTROCK, K ;
LEHMANN, KA .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (03) :603-607
[9]  
KORTTILA K, 1979, ANESTH ANALG, V58, P396
[10]  
Kovac A, 1992, Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl, V6, P37