Ignorance and Resilience in Local Adaptation to Climate Change - Inconsistencies between Theory-Driven Recommendations and Empirical Findings in the Case of the 2002 Elbe Flood

被引:13
作者
Kuhlicke, Christian [1 ]
Kruse, Sylvia [2 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Helmholtz Zentrum Umweltforsch GmbH, Dept Stadt & Umweltsoziol, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Eidg Forsch Anstalt Wald Schnee & Landschaft, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
来源
GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY | 2009年 / 18卷 / 03期
关键词
adaptation; case study; climate change; Elbe flood; ignorance; nescience; resilience; NATURAL HAZARDS; VULNERABILITY;
D O I
10.14512/gaia.18.3.11
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper identifies a central challenge relating to the adaptation to climate change on the local level: how to deal with the unknown and how to create a resilient environment. Although a consensus exists that our climate will change to a hitherto unknown extent, the anticipation of local and regional consequences has reached its limits. The primary reason for this is the unknown interference of social development and natural processes. This paper suggests a practical typology of (non-)knowledge and distinguishes between two main strategies of how to deal with unknown developments: anticipation and resilience. In a case study on the extreme Elbe flood in 2002, local adaptation strategies and lessons learned are investigated against the background of the previously introduced concepts of the unknown and adaptation strategies. The empirical findings show a gap between the local activities during and after the flood event and the scientific concepts of resilient adaptation strategies. Local actions mainly rely on anticipation and strong expectations. Resilient features are hard to detect and mostly come into conflict with the realized local adaptation strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 254
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条