Dopaminergic and opiate agonists and antagonists differentially decrease multiple schedule responding maintained by sucrose/ethanol and sucrose

被引:24
作者
Slawecki, CJ
Hodge, CW
Samson, HH
机构
[1] Dept. of Physiology and Pharmacology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem
关键词
multiple schedule; reinforcement; sucrose/ethanol; sucrose; amphetamine; haloperidol; morphine; naloxone;
D O I
10.1016/S0741-8329(96)00153-X
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Similar neurobiological mechanisms are hypothesized to influence ethanol- and food-related reinforcement processes. This study examined the ability of compounds with dopaminergic or opiate activity to selectively alter responding maintained by a sucrose/ethanol solution in comparison to a sucrose solution. Long-Evans rats were trained to press a lever using 5% sucrose/10% ethanol and 5% sucrose as the reinforcers on a multiple Fix-ed Ratio 4 Fixed Ratio 4 schedule of reinforcement. When stable responding was established, the effects of intraperitoneally administered amphetamine (0.0-3.0 mg/kg), haloperidol (0.0-1.0 mg/kg), morphine (0.0-10.0 mg/kg), and naloxone (0.0-10.0 mg/kg) were examined on total session reinforcer presentation and presentation of each reinforcer within individual multiple schedule components. Prior to drug treatment, the total number of reinforcer presentations of the sucrose/ethanol solution was significantly greater than sucrose reinforcer presentations, suggesting the sucrose/ethanol solution was a more efficacious reinforcer. AU agents administered decreased responding maintained by sucrose/ethanol and sucrose. The dose-effect curves for sucrose/ethanol were shifted to the left compared to sucrose, suggesting that although the compounds did not selectively impact sucrose/ethanol-maintained responding, sucrose/ethanol-maintained responding was more sensitive to the effects of these compounds. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 294
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Barrett J.E., 1987, PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY 3, P1493
[2]   AMPHETAMINE-INDUCED DOPAMINE RELEASE IN THE RAT STRIATUM - AN INVIVO MICRODIALYSIS STUDY [J].
BUTCHER, SP ;
FAIRBROTHER, IS ;
KELLY, JS ;
ARBUTHNOTT, GW .
JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY, 1988, 50 (02) :346-355
[3]   INTERACTIONS OF BEHAVIORAL-EFFECTS OF DRUGS [J].
DEWS, PB .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1976, 281 (DEC10) :50-63
[4]   SUCROSE, ETHANOL, AND SUCROSE/ETHANOL REINFORCED RESPONDING UNDER VARIABLE-INTERVAL SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT [J].
FILES, FJ ;
SAMSON, HH ;
BRICE, GT .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 19 (05) :1271-1278
[5]  
FUCHS V, 1984, DRUG ALCOHOL DEPEN, V14, P179, DOI 10.1016/0376-8716(84)90043-7
[6]   Effects of Dopamine Reuptake Inhibitors on Food- and Cocaine-Maintained Responding: I. Dependence on Unit Dose of Cocaine [J].
Glowa, John R. ;
Wojnicki, Francis H. E. ;
Matecka, Dorota ;
Bacher, John D. ;
Mansbach, Robert S. ;
Balster, Robert L. ;
Rice, Kenner C. .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 3 (03) :219-231
[7]   MORPHINE-INDUCED FEEDING - A COMPARISON OF THE LEWIS AND FISCHER 344 INBRED RAT STRAINS [J].
GOSNELL, BA ;
KRAHN, DD .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1993, 44 (04) :919-924
[8]   EFFECTS OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC MORPHINE ON FOOD-INTAKE IN RATS - MODULATION BY OXYTOCIN AND VASOPRESSIN [J].
GULATI, K ;
RAY, A ;
SHARMA, KK .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1991, 40 (01) :27-32
[9]   DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS OF TYR-MIF-1, MIF-1, AND NALOXONE ON PEPTIDE YY-INDUCED HYPERPHAGIA [J].
HAGAN, MM ;
MOSS, DE .
PEPTIDES, 1994, 15 (02) :243-245
[10]   COMPARISON OF NEUROKININ SUBSTANCE-P WITH MORPHINE IN EFFECTS ON FOOD-REINFORCED OPERANT-BEHAVIOR AND FEEDING [J].
HASENOHRL, RU ;
SCHWARTING, RKW ;
GERHARDT, P ;
PRIVOU, C ;
HUSTON, JP .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1994, 55 (03) :541-546