Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor using ropivacaine and fentanyl provides better maternal satisfaction with less local anesthetic requirement

被引:24
作者
Saito M. [1 ]
Okutomi T. [1 ]
Kanai Y. [2 ]
Mochizuki J. [2 ]
Tani A. [2 ]
Amano K. [2 ]
Hoka S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Anesthesiology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara 228-8555
[2] Department of Obstetric Gynecology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara 228-8555
关键词
Labor analgesia; Patient-controlled epidural analgesia; Ropivacaine; VAS satisfaction;
D O I
10.1007/s00540-005-0316-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose. To test the hypothesis that patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using ropivacaine and fentanyl provides better maternal satisfaction and less anesthetic requirement than conventional continuous epidural infusion (CEI) during labor, we studied 58 uncomplicated parturients (singleton, vertex presentation). Methods. After establishing effective epidural analgesia with 11 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine, all parturients were randomly divided into one of two groups: the PCEA group (n = 29) or the CEI group (n = 29). In the PCEA group, the pump was initiated to deliver a basal infusion at 6 ml·h-1 and a demand dose of 5 ml; the lockout interval was 10 min, and there was a 31 ml·h-1 limit. The drugs used were 0.1% ropivacaine + fentanyl 2 μg·ml-1. In the CEI group, epidural analgesia was maintained with the same solution as the PCEA group at a constant rate of 10 ml·h-1. If parturients requested additional analgesia in the CEI group, we added 8 ml of epidural 0.2% ropivacaine without fentanyl. Results. Parturients' demographic data, such as duration of labor, mode of delivery, Apgar score, and umbilical arterial pH did not differ between the two groups. However, the hourly requirement of ropivacaine was significantly less in the PCEA group than in the CEI group (9.3 ± 2.5 vs. 17.6 ± 7.6 mg·h-1; P < 0.05). Parturients' satisfaction assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale tended to be higher in the PCEA group than in the CEI group. Side effects such as nausea, hypotension, and itching were similar for the two groups. Conclusion. We found that PCEA was an effective means of providing optimal analgesia, with better satisfaction during labor and less local anesthetic requirement. © JSA 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 212
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
Gambling D.R., Yu P., Cole C., McMorland G.H., Palmer L., A comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labour, Can. J. Anaesth., 35, pp. 249-254, (1988)
[2]
Owen M.D., Thomas J.A., Smith T., Harris L.C., D'Angelo R., Ropivacaine 0.075% and bupivacaine 0.075% with fentanyl 2 μg/ml are equivalent for labor epidural analgesia, Anesth. Analg., 94, pp. 179-183, (2002)
[3]
Owen M.D., D'Angelo R., Gerancher J.C., Thompson J.M., Foss M.L., Babb J.D., Eisenach J.C., 0.125% Ropivacaine is similar to 0.125% Ropivacaine for labor analgesia using patient-controlled epidural infusion, Anesth. Analg., 86, pp. 527-531, (1998)
[4]
Chua N.P., Sia A.T., Ocampo C.E., Parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour: Bupivacaine vs. ropivacaine, Anaesthesia, 56, pp. 1169-1173, (2001)
[5]
Meister G.C., D'Angelo R., Owen M., Nelson K.E., Gaver R., A comparison of epidural analgesia with 0.125% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl during labor, Anesth. Analg., 90, pp. 632-637, (2000)
[6]
Halpern S.H., Breen T.W., Campbell D.C., Muir H.A., Kronberg J., Nunn R., Fick G.H., A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing bupivacaine with ropivacaine for labor analgesia, Anesthesiology, 98, pp. 1431-1435, (2003)
[7]
Ferrante F.M., Lu L., Jamison S.B., Datta S., Patient-controlled epidural analgesia: Demand dosing, Anesth. Analg., 73, pp. 547-552, (1991)
[8]
Gambling D.R., Huber C.J., Berkowitz J., Howell P., Swenerton J.E., Ross P.L.E., Crochetiere C.T., Pavy T.J.G., Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour: Varying bolus dose and lockout interval, Can. J. Anaesth., 40, pp. 211-217, (1993)
[9]
Ferrante F.M., Rosinia F.A., Gordon C., Datta S., The role of continuous background infusions in patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor and delivery, Anesth. Analg., 79, pp. 80-84, (1994)
[10]
Curry P.D., Pacsoo C., Heap D.G., Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in obstetric anaesthetic practice, Pain, 57, pp. 125-127, (1994)