Advances in sepsis therapy

被引:34
作者
Glück T. [1 ]
Opal S.M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Klin. und Poliklin. F. Inn. Med. I, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg
[2] Division of Infectious Diseases, Brown Medical School, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
[3] Infectious Disease Division, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Pawtucket, RI 02860
关键词
Severe Sepsis; Disseminate Intravascular Coagulation; Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor; Drotrecogin Alfa; Sepsis Mortality;
D O I
10.2165/00003495-200464080-00004
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
During the past 3 years new insights have been gained into the fundamental elements that underlie the pathogenesis of sepsis, and after years of frustrating failures, progress in the basic understanding of sepsis has translated into successful new therapies. These new treatment strategies have significantly improved the outcome of patients experiencing the puzzling syndrome of severe sepsis. More effective supportive therapies with early, goal-oriented therapy including volume resuscitation, catecholamine therapy and transfusion improve the chances for survival in septic shock. Novel endocrine management with hydrocortisone replacement therapy for relative adrenal insufficiency in septic shock patients and strict blood glucose control provide a survival advantage in critically ill patients. Administering appropriate antimicrobial therapy, nutritional support and ventilation protocols with low tidal volumes have now been shown to benefit septic patients. Finally, human recombinant activated protein C (drotrecogin alfa), which ameliorates sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation and exerts several other favourable effects on endothelial cells, has been shown to reduce mortality in patients with severe sepsis. On the basis of newly discovered pathophysiological mechanisms of sepsis, several other adjuvant therapies for sepsis are in various stages of preclinical and clinical development. Individualised and optimal supportive care with efforts to reverse the precipitating cause of sepsis remains the mainstay of therapy for severe sepsis. How these new and often expensive regimens will fit into the standard treatment approach to sepsis remains to be defined by future clinical investigations.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 859
页数:22
相关论文
共 146 条
  • [1] Angus D.C., Linde-Zwirble W.T., Lidicker J., Et al., Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care, Crit Care Med, 29, pp. 1303-1310, (2001)
  • [2] Angus D.C., Wax R.S., Epidemiology of sepsis: An update, Crit Care Med, 29, 7 SUPPL., (2001)
  • [3] Alberti C., Brun-Buisson C., Burchardi H., Et al., Epidemiology of sepsis and infection in ICU patients from an international multicentre cohort study, Intensive Care Med, 28, pp. 108-121, (2001)
  • [4] Bone R.C., Balk R.A., Cerra F.B., Et al., Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis: ACCP/SCCM consensus conference, Chest, 101, pp. 1644-1655, (1992)
  • [5] Abraham E., Why immunomodulatory therapies have not worked in sepsis, Intensive Care Med, 25, pp. 556-566, (1999)
  • [6] Eidelman L.A., Sprung C.L., Why have new effective therapies for sepsis not been developed?, Crit Care Med, 22, pp. 1330-1334, (1994)
  • [7] Beutler B., Endotoxin, tumor necrosis factor, and related mediators: New approaches to shock, New Horiz, 1, pp. 3-12, (1993)
  • [8] Pfeiffer R., Untersuchungen über das Cholera Gift, Z Hyg Infektionskr, 11, pp. 393-412, (1892)
  • [9] Centanni E., Untersuchungen über das Fiebergift der Bacterien, Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 20, pp. 148-176, (1894)
  • [10] Lynn W.A., Anti-endotoxin therapeutic options for the treatment of sepsis, J Antimicrob Chemother, 41, SUPPL. A, pp. 71-80, (1998)