Medical information retrieval: Development and evaluation of a context-based document representation for searching the medical literature

被引:18
作者
Purcell G.P. [1 ]
Rennels G.D. [2 ]
Shortliffe E.H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, Duke Hospital, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
[2] Section on Medical Informatics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford
关键词
Context models; Full-text retrieval; Interindex consistency; Medical publications;
D O I
10.1007/s007990050023
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Conventional full-text systems represent documents as sets of index terms, and queries to these systems often retrieve irrelevant material when search terms occur in inappropriate contexts. We have developed document representations that capture the semantic contexts in which text words occur. Many bodies of literature contain stereotypic categories of information. For example, articles describing medical research consistently discuss interventions and outcomes. These semantic themes provide context for terms in the text, and thus, can facilitate precise full-text searches. We have used a contextual model of clinical research articles, case reports, and review articles as the basis for a document representation in a full-text retrieval system. In this paper, we describe the creation of context models for medical publications and the evaluation of these models using interindexer consistency. We demonstrate that such models are easily understood and employed by readers of the literature (and thus, the searchers). Accordingly, these models may constitute a powerful representation for information retrieval. We discuss the suitability of this technique for other domains. © Springer-Verlag 1997.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 296
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles, Annals of Internal Medicine, 106, pp. 598-604, (1987)
  • [2] Checklist of information for inclusion in reports of clinical trials, Annals of Internal Medicine, 124, 8, pp. 741-813, (1996)
  • [3] Cohen J., A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, l, pp. 37-46, (1960)
  • [4] Fleiss J., Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters, Psychological Bulletin, 76, 5, pp. 378-382, (1971)
  • [5] Froom P., Froom J., Deficiencies in structured medical abstracts, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 7, pp. 591-594, (1993)
  • [6] Funk M.E., Reid C.A., Indexing consistency in MEDLINE, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 71, 2, pp. 176-183, (1983)
  • [7] Glowniak J.V., Medical resources on the internet, Annals of Internal Medicine, 123, 2, pp. 123-131, (1995)
  • [8] Heller M.B., Structured abstracts: A modest dissent, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44, 8, pp. 739-740, (1991)
  • [9] Hersh W.R., Hickam D.H., A comparison of retrieval effectiveness for three methods of indexing medical literature, American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 303, 5, pp. 292-300, (1992)
  • [10] Hersh W.R., Hickam D.H., Haynes R.B., McKibbon K.A., A performance and failure analysis of SAPHIRE with a MEDLINE test collection, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1, 1, pp. 51-60, (1994)