Interference screw fixation of hamstring vs patellar tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

被引:59
作者
Aune A.K. [1 ,2 ]
Ekeland A. [3 ]
Cawley P.W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Orthopaedic Department, Buskerud Central Hospital
[2] Institute for Surgical Research, University of Oslo, Oslo
[3] Martina Hansens Hospital, Sandvika
[4] Smith and Nephew Donjoy Inc., Carlsbad, CA
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament; Graft fixation; Hamstrings; Patellar tendon; Quadruple semitendinosus-gracilis graft;
D O I
10.1007/s001670050080
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The present study was designed to investigate the fixation strength of a quadruple semitendinosus-gracilis graft compared with a middle-third bone-patellar tendon-bone graft using a new interference screw developed to fix hamstrings grafts for ACL reconstructions (RCI, Smith & Nephew Donjoy). Five pairs of human cadaveric knees from donors with a mean age of 43 (range 33-52) years were used. One knee of each pair was randomly allocated to be reconstructed on the femoral side with a semitendinosus-gracilis graft from the same donor using RCI screw fixation. As the control, the contralateral knee was correspondingly reconstructed with a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft using the same interference screw. The grafts were pulled out at a velocity of 30 mm/s by an axially applied load using a MTS machine. The mean (SD) failure load for the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft fixations was 505 (25) N, 110% stronger than the mean failure load for the semitendinosus-gracilis graft fixations, which was 240 (47) N (P = 0.003). The stiffness for the patellar tendon-bone graft fixations was 46 (11) N/mm, 120% stiffer than the semitendinosus-gracilis graft fixations, which was 22 (11) N/mm (P = 0.01). This study shows that the interference screw principle used for ACL reconstructions with hamstrings tendons is inferior to that for bone-patellar tendon-bone reconstructions although the screw was developed especially for soft-tissue fixation in bone tunnels.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 102
页数:3
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Aglietti P., Buzzi R., Zaccherotti G., De Biase P., Patellar tendon versus doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Am J Sports Med, 22, pp. 211-218, (1994)
[2]  
Otero A.L., Hutcheson L., A comparison of the doubled semitendinosus/gracilis and central third of the patellar tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Arthroscopy, 9, pp. 143-148, (1993)
[3]  
Sachs R.A., Reznik A., Daniel D.M., Stone M.L., Complications of knee ligament surgery, Knee Ligaments: Structure, Function, Injury and Repair, pp. 505-520, (1990)
[4]  
Yashuda K., Tsujino J., Ohkoshi Y., Tanabe Y., Kaneda K., Graft site morbidity with autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons, Am J Sports Med, 23, pp. 706-714, (1995)
[5]  
Cross M.J., Roger G., Kujawa P., Anderson I.F., Regeneration of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons following their transection for repair of the anterior cruciate ligament, Am J Sports Med, 20, pp. 221-223, (1992)
[6]  
Marder R.A., Raskind J.R., Carroll M., Prospective evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendons, Am J Sports Med, 19, pp. 478-1184, (1991)
[7]  
Rodeo S.A., Arnoczky S.P., Torzilli P.A., Hidaka C., Tendon healing in a bone tunnel, J Bone Joint Surg [Am], 75, pp. 1795-1803, (1993)
[8]  
Pena F., Grontvedt T., Brown G.A., Aune A.K., Engebretsen L., Comparison of failure strength between metallic and absorbable interference screws: Influence of insertion torque, tunnel-bone block gap, bone mineral density, and interference, Am J Sports Med, 24, pp. 329-334, (1996)
[9]  
Robertson D.B., Daniel D.M., Biden E., Soft tissue fixation to bone, Am J Sports Med, 15, pp. 398-403, (1986)
[10]  
Steiner M.E., Hecker A.T., Brown Jr. C.H., Hayes W.C., Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation. Comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts, Am J Sports Med, 22, pp. 240-247, (1994)