Identifying students' perceptions of the important classroom features affecting learning aspects of a design-based learning environment

被引:3
作者
Doppelt Y. [1 ,2 ]
Schunn C.D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Learning Research and Development Center (LRDC), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
[2] Segev 20170
关键词
Classroom features; Design-based learning; Learning environment; Learning outcomes; Science and technology;
D O I
10.1007/s10984-008-9047-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Across several decades, educational researchers have investigated the contribution of the learning environment to the attainment of educational goals, such as improving academic achievement and motivation to learn. The term learning environment not only includes physical activities in the classroom (e.g. experiments kits, computers), but also includes teaching methods, the type of learning in which pupils are engaged, and assessment methods. In this research, we refined an approach to measuring the impact of a variety of classroom features on many different learning outcomes through the lens of students' perception. A new instrument, the Design-Based Learning Environment Questionnaire (DBLEQ), was field-tested in an eighth-grade USA science classroom setting. This study examined pre-post changes for two different curricula, one emphasising design-based learning (n = 464) and another emphasising scripted inquiry (n = 248). The value of the instrument and ways of analysing its data are illustrated through the range of differences that were found between conditions over time. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 209
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Barak M., Doppelt Y., Integrating the Cognitive Research Trust (CoRT) programme for creative thinking into a project-based technology curriculum, Research in Science & Technological Education, 17, pp. 139-151, (1999)
[2]  
Barak M., Doppelt Y., Using portfolios to enhance creative thinking, Journal of Technology Studies, 26, pp. 16-24, (2000)
[3]  
Barak M., Eisenberg E., Harel O., What's in the calculator?' An introductory project for technology studies, Research in Science & Technological Education, 12, pp. 147-154, (1995)
[4]  
Barak M., Raz E., Hot air balloons: Project centered study as a bridge between science and technology education, Science Education, 84, pp. 27-42, (1998)
[5]  
Barlex D., Banks F., Organising project work, Teaching Technology, pp. 124-143, (1994)
[6]  
Barlex D., The relationship between science and design & technology in the secondary school curriculum in England, Technology Education in the Curriculum: Relationships with Other Subjects. Proceedings PATT-12 Conference, pp. 3-12, (2002)
[7]  
De Vries M.J., Technology education: Beyond the "technology is applied Science" paradigm, Journal of Technology Education, 8, pp. 7-15, (1996)
[8]  
Doppelt Y., Implementing and assessing project-based learning in a flexible environment, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, pp. 255-272, (2003)
[9]  
Doppelt Y., Impact of science-technology learning environment characteristics on learning outcomes: Pupils' perceptions and gender differences, Learning Environments Research, 7, pp. 271-293, (2004)
[10]  
Doppelt Y., Science-technology learning environment: Teachers and pupils' perceptions, Learning Environments Research, 9, pp. 163-178, (2006)