The role of spatial attention and other processes on the magnitude and time course of cueing effects

被引:27
作者
Funes M.J. [1 ]
Lupiáñez J. [1 ]
Milliken B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Departamento de Psicologia Experimental Y Fisiologia del Comportamiento Facultad de Psicologia, Universidad de Granada, Campus de Cartuja
[2] McMaster University, Hamilton
关键词
Attentional modulation; Exogenous and endogenous attention; Integration; IOR; Spatial attention; Spatial cueing; Spatial orienting;
D O I
10.1007/s10339-004-0038-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We are quite often exposed to multiple objects present in the visual scene, thus attentional selection is necessary in order to selectively respond to the relevant information. Objects can be selected on the basis of the location they occupy by orienting attention in space. In this paper, we review the evidence showing that attention can be oriented in space either endogenously, on the basis of central cues, predictive of the relevant location, or exogenously, automatically triggered by the salient properties of visual stimuli (peripheral cues). Several dissociations observed between orienting on the basis of the two types of cues have led to the conclusion that they do not represent just two modes of triggering the orienting of the very same attentional mechanism, but rather they modulate processing differently. We present a theoretical framework according to which endogenous predictive cues facilitate target processing by orienting attention, thus amplifying processing at the attended location. In contrast, apart from attentional orienting, peripherally presented discrepant cues might trigger additional cue-target event-integration and event-segregation processes, which modulate processing in a different way, thus leading to cueing effects that are exclusively triggered by peripheral cues.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 116
页数:18
相关论文
共 130 条
[1]  
Anllo-Vento L., Shifting attention in visual space. The effects of peripheral cueing on brain cortical potentials, Int J Neurosci, 80, pp. 353-370, (1995)
[2]  
Arnott S.R., Pratt J., Shore D.I., Alain C., Attentional set modulates visual areas: An event-related potential study of attentional capture, Cogn Brain Res, 12, 3, pp. 383-395, (2001)
[3]  
Bartolomeo P., Chokron S., Orienting of attention in left unilateral neglect, Neurosci B, 26, 2, pp. 217-234, (2002)
[4]  
Berger A., Henik A., The endogenous modulation of IOR is nasal-temporal asymmetric, J Cogn Neurosci, 12, 3, pp. 421-428, (2000)
[5]  
Berlucchi G., Chelazzi L., Tassinari G., Volitional covert orienting to a peripheral cue does not suppress cue-induced inhibition of return, J Cogn Neurosci, 12, 4, pp. 648-663, (2000)
[6]  
Briand K.A., Feature integration and spatial attention: More evidence of a dissociation between endogenous and exogenous orienting, J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 24, 4, pp. 1243-1256, (1998)
[7]  
Briand K.A., Klein R.M., Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory, J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 13, pp. 228-241, (1987)
[8]  
Carrasco M., Penpeci-Talgar C., Eckstein M., Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: Support for signal enhancement, Vision Res, 40, 10-12, pp. 1203-1215, (2000)
[9]  
Chica A.B., Lupianez J., Inhibition of return without return of attention, Psicothema, 16, 2, pp. 248-254, (2004)
[10]  
Ciaramitaro V.M., Cameron E.L., Glimcher P.W., Stimulus probability directs spatial attention: An enhancement of sensitivity in humans and monkeys, Vision Res, 41, 1, pp. 57-75, (2001)