The impact of incremental innovation in biopharmaceuticals: drug utilisation in original and supplemental indications.

被引:31
作者
Berndt E.R. [1 ]
Cockburn I.M. [1 ]
Grépin K.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Institute of Technology and National Bureau of Economic Research,Alfred P. Sloan School of MA
[2] Boston University,undefined
[3] National Bureau of Economic Research,undefined
[4] Harvard University,undefined
[5] Massachusetts Institute of Technology,undefined
关键词
Prevacid; Herfindahl Index; Incremental Innovation; Paxil; Biologics License Application;
D O I
10.2165/00019053-200624002-00008
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The apparent decrease in the rate of approval of new molecular entities has provoked extensive discussion and fears that the productivity of biopharmaceutical research and development has severely declined in recent years. To investigate the extent to which traditional measures of innovative output neglect important innovations that occur after a drug receives initial market approval. Data on drug utilisation by diagnosis for the period 1999-2004 were combined with data on the approval histories of three important classes of drugs: ACE inhibitors, histamine H(2)-antagonists/proton-pump inhibitors, and selective serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. Counts of new drug approvals by the FDA were classified as new indications, new dosages, new combinations, new formulations, and labeling for expanded populations. Large numbers of such "supplemental" approvals were obtained. The share of drug utilisation in indications other than that specified in the initially approved labeling was computed, and found to be very substantial in two out of the three drug classes considered. Significant incremental innovation to existing pharmaceutical products has been occurring in the form of supplementary approvals for new dosages, formulations, and indications. These innovations account for a substantial share of drug utilisation and associated economic and medical benefits. Productivity trends for research and development based on counts of new molecular entities alone have therefore overlooked an important source of innovation in biopharmaceuticals.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 86
页数:17
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Comanor WS(1965)Research and technical change in the pharmaceutical industry Rev Econ Stat 47 182-90
  • [2] Vernon JM(1974)Technical change and firm size: the pharmaceutical industry Rev Econ Stat 56 294-302
  • [3] Gusen P(1994)Do important drugs reach the market sooner? RAND J Econ 25 402-22
  • [4] Dranove D(1980)The measurement of pharmaceutical innovation J Clin Pharmacol 20 1-9
  • [5] Meltzer D(1987)New indications for already-approved drugs: time trends for the new drug application review phase Clin Pharmacol Ther 41 368-70
  • [6] Wardell WM(2004)Once-daily valacyclovir to reduce the risk of transmission of genital herpes N Engl J Med 350 11-20
  • [7] DiRaddo J(2003)The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs J Health Econ 22 151-85
  • [8] Spivey RN(2003)Editorial: new estimates of drug development costs J Health Econ 22 325-30
  • [9] Lasagna L(2004)The economics of follow-on drug research and development Pharmacoeconomics 22 1-14
  • [10] Trimble AG(1994)Theraputic class wars: drug promotion in a competitive marketplace New Eng J Med 331 1350-3