Epistemic and social scripts in computer–supported collaborative learning

被引:10
作者
Armin Weinberger
Bernhard Ertl
Frank Fischer
Heinz Mandl
机构
[1] Knowledge Media Research Center Tübingen,
[2] Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich,undefined
来源
Instructional Science | 2005年 / 33卷
关键词
computer-supported collaborative learning; CSCL; cooperation scripts; computer-mediated communication; discussion boards; videoconferencing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Collaborative learning in computer-supported learning environments typically means that learners work on tasks together, discussing their individual perspectives via text-based media or videoconferencing, and consequently acquire knowledge. Collaborative learning, however, is often sub-optimal with respect to how learners work on the concepts that are supposed to be learned and how learners interact with each other. One possibility to improve collaborative learning environments is to conceptualize epistemic scripts, which specify how learners work on a given task, and social scripts, which structure how learners interact with each other. In this contribution, two studies will be reported that investigated the effects of epistemic and social scripts in a text-based computer-supported learning environment and in a videoconferencing learning environment in order to foster the individual acquisition of knowledge. In each study the factors ‘epistemic script’ and ‘social script’ have been independently varied in a 2 × 2-factorial design. A total of 182 university students of educational science participated in these two studies. Results of both studies show that social scripts can be substantially beneficial with respect to the individual acquisition of knowledge, whereas epistemic scripts apparently do not always lead to the expected effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 30
页数:29
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Baker M.(1997)Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 13 175-193
  • [2] Lund K.(1983)Effects of structural schema training and text organization on expository prose processing Journal of Educational Psychology 75 811-820
  • [3] Brooks L.W.(2001)Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in learning from incompatible information Instructional Science 29 443-479
  • [4] Dansereau D.F.(1981)Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices Cognitive Science 5 121-152
  • [5] Chan C.K.K.(1993)The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction Review of Educational Research 63 1-49
  • [6] Chi M.T.H.(2003)Designing effective science inquiry in text-based computer supported collaborative learning environments International Journal of Educational Policy, Research & Practice 4 55-82
  • [7] Feltovich P.J.(1994)Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups Review of Educational Research 64 1-35
  • [8] Glaser R.(1979)Development and evaluation of a learning strategy program Journal of Educational Psychology 71 64-73
  • [9] Chinn C.A.(1992)Constraining novices to perform expertlike problem analyses: Effects on schema acquisition The Journal of the Learning Sciences 2 307-331
  • [10] Brewer W.F.(2002)Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools Learning and Instruction 12 213-232