A first feasibility study of temozolomide for Japanese patients with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme

被引:11
作者
Tomokazu Aoki
Tomohiko Mizutani
Masatsune Ishikawa
Kazuhiko Sugiyama
Nobuo Hashimoto
机构
[1] Department of Neurosurgery, Kitano Hospital, Kita-ku, Osaka 530-8480
[2] Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima
[3] Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto
关键词
Feasibility study; Glioma; Japanese patients; Temozolomide;
D O I
10.1007/s10147-003-0339-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The efficacy of temozolomide has been evaluated in phase I and phase II trials in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas in the United States and the European Union. We report a feasibility study of the palliative efficacy of temozolomide for patients with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Methods. Sixteen patients with at least two prior chemotherapy regimens were enrolled in the study. Nine patients were confirmed to have GBM and 7 patients were confirmed to have AA at the latest pathology review, and all had a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of over 50%. The median age was 57 years (range, 31-65 years). Results. No cumulative toxicity was observed at any dose level when temozolomide was administered on a once-daily, 5-day schedule. Myelosuppression occurred, with the nadir being mid-late in the cycle (day 14 or 21). National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria (NCI-CTC) grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity did not occur. In the 9 GBM patients, the overall response rate (complete response + partial response [CR + PR]) was 0%. The median time to progression (TTP) was 3.5 months, and the rates of progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 and 12 months were 40% and 0%. In the 7 AA patients, the overall response rate (CR + PR) was 29% and median TTP was 9 months, while PFS rates at 6 and 12 months were 80% and 30%. Conclusion. The favorable safety profile and the efficacy of temozolomide in Japanese patients are not incompatible with the results seen with patients in the United States and the European Union.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 304
页数:3
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Huncharek M., Muscat J., Treatment of recurrent high grade astrocytoma
[2]  
results of a systematic review of 1415 patients, Anticancer Res, 18, pp. 1303-1311, (1998)
[3]  
Brada M., Judson I., Beale P., Et al., Phase I dose-escalation and pharmacokinetic study of temozolomide (SCH 52365) for refractory or relapsing malignancies, Br J Cancer, 81, pp. 1022-1030, (1999)
[4]  
Stevens M.F., Newlands E.S., From triazines and triazenes to temozolomide, Eur J Cancer, 29 A, pp. 1045-1047, (1993)
[5]  
Yung W.K., Prados M.D., Yaya-Tur R., Et al., Multicenter phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or anaplastic oligoastrocytoma at first relapse, J Clin Oncol, 17, pp. 2762-2771, (1999)
[6]  
Therasse P., Arbuck S.G., Eisenhauer E.A., Et al., New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors, J Natl Cancer Inst, 92, pp. 205-216, (2000)
[7]  
Newlands E.S., Stevens M.F., Wedge S.R., Et al., Temozolomide: A review of its discovery, chemical properties, pre-clinical development and clinical trials, Cancer Treat Rev, 23, pp. 35-61, (1997)
[8]  
Dhodapkar M., Rubin J., Reid J.M., Et al., Phase I trial of temozolomide (NSC 362856) in patients with advanced cancer, Clin Cancer Res, 3, pp. 1093-1100, (1997)
[9]  
Brada M., Hoang-Xuan K., Rampling R., Et al., Multicenter phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse, Ann Oncol, 12, pp. 259-266, (2001)
[10]  
Yung W.K., Albright R.E., Olson J., Et al., A phase II study of temozolomide vs procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse, Br J Cancer, 83, pp. 588-593, (2000)