Histological studies of monofilament and multifilament polypropylene mesh implants demonstrate equivalent penetration of macrophages between fibrils

被引:28
作者
Papadimitriou J. [1 ]
Petros P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] University of Western Australia, Perth, WA
[2] Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA
[3] Kvinno Centre, South Perth, WA 6151
关键词
Collagen; 3; Macrophages; Monofilament; Multifilament; Polypropylene mesh; Proteoglycans; Surgery; Tissue reaction;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-004-0286-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The tissue reaction to implanted monofilamentous and multifilamentous polypropylene mesh was compared in samples removed at operation from the perivaginal area of a 58 year old patient. The fibrils of both were surrounded by collagenous connective tissue, collagen types I and III, and proteoglycans. Smaller, less compacted bundles were seen in the vicinity of the monofilamentous mesh than around the multifilamentous mesh, and in addition, a greater number of inflammatory cells and larger multinucleate giant cells were seen apposed to the monofilamentous mesh. Following this, eight rats were implanted with multifilamentous synthetic polypropylene tape and examined at two, four, six and eight weeks after surgery. Macrophages and multinucleated giant cells were seen in the immediate vicinity of the fibrils, while fibrovascular connective tissue surrounded the implantation site. These observations do not support the prevailing hypotheses that macrophages cannot penetrate between the fibrils of multifilament tape. They do suggest that differences in tensile strength may be present in the artificial neoligaments created by the two tapes. © Springer-Verlag 2004.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 78
页数:3
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Yamada H., Mechanical properties of urogenital organs and tissues, Strength of Biological Materials, pp. 272-280, (1970)
[2]  
Petros P.E., Ulmsten U., Papadimitriou J., The Autogenic Neoligament procedure: A technique for planned formation of an artificial neo-ligament, Acta Obstet. Gyn. Scan. Suppl., 153, 69, pp. 43-51, (1990)
[3]  
Amid P.K., Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery, Hernia, 1, pp. 15-21, (1997)
[4]  
Papadimitriou J.M., Ashman R.B., Macrophages: Current views on their differentiation, structure and function, Ultrastruct. Path., 13, pp. 343-358, (1989)
[5]  
Peyrat L., Boutin J.M., Bruyere F., Haillot O., Fakfak H., Lanson Y., Intestinal perforation as a complication of tension-free vaginal tape procedure for urinary incontinence, Eur. Urol., 39, 5, pp. 603-605, (2001)
[6]  
Koelbl H., Stoerer S., Seliger G., Wolters M., Transurethral penetration of a tension-free vaginal tape, Brit. J. Obstet. Gynaec., 108, 7, (2001)
[7]  
Rechberger T., Rzezniczuk K., Skorupski P., Adamiak A., Tomaszewski J., Et al., A randomized comparison between monofilament and multifilament tapes for stress incontinence surgery, Int. J. Urogynecol., 14, pp. 432-436, (2003)
[8]  
Ulmsten U., Henriksson L., Johnson P., Varhos G., An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence, Int. Urogynecol. J., 7, pp. 81-86, (1996)
[9]  
Coda A., Botto-Micca F., Quaglino F., Ramellini G., In vivo tissue reaction to different prosthetic materials in abdominal wall hernia repair, Hernia, 4, pp. 206-211, (2000)
[10]  
Greca F.H., de Paula J.B., Biondo-Simoes M.L.P., da Costa F.D., da Silva A.P.G., Time S., Mansur A., The influence of differing pore sizes on the biocompatibility of two polypropylene meshes in the repair of abdominal defects. Experimental study in dogs, Hernia, 5, pp. 59-64, (2001)