Sunk Costs and the Entry Decision

被引:1
作者
T.W. Ross
机构
[1] University of British Columbia,Sauder School of Business
关键词
sunk costs; barriers to entry;
D O I
10.1023/B:JICT.0000037355.82246.e0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper considers the role of sunk costs in the decision to enter a market. Its goal is to provide a policy-relevant approach to the question: when are sunk costs so great as to serve as a barrier to entry? To do this, the model presented nests both a model of pure hit-and-run entry and a simple “lottery-ticket” model of long-term entry in which the entrant knows that entry may or may not ultimately prove successful. It illustrates clearly the strategic differences between sunk and nonsunk fixed costs. The paper also considers the incumbent’s problem of choosing between entry deterrence and accommodation. Finally, out of this model comes a measure of the height of the sunk cost barrier to entry that may be useful for competition policy purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 93
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Appelbaum E.(1985)Contestable markets under uncertainty RAND Journal of Economics 16 28-40
[2]  
Lim C.(1997)The problem with Baker Hughes and Syufy: on the role of entry in merger analysis Antitrust Law Journal 65 353-374
[3]  
Baker J.(1994)Measuring the importance of sunk costs Annales d'Economie et de Statistique 34 181-217
[4]  
Bresnahan T.(1988)Contestability: a revisionist view Economica 55 269-276
[5]  
Reiss P.(1991)Dynamic price competition, briefly sunk costs, and entry deterrence RAND Journal of Economics 22 519-530
[6]  
Cairnes R.(1980)The role of investment in entry deterrence Economic Journal 90 95-106
[7]  
Mahabir D.(1987)A theory of market structure with sequential entry RAND Journal of Economics 18 1-16
[8]  
Davies S.(1980)Exit barriers are entry barriers: The durability of capital as a barrier to entry Bell Journal of Economics 11 721-729
[9]  
Dixit A.(1986)How effective is potential competition? Economics Letters 20 67-70
[10]  
Eaton C.(2002)When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? RAND Journal of Economics 33 571-586