Reallocating water from canal irrigation for environmental flows: Benefits forgone in the Upper Ganga Basin in India

被引:3
作者
Amarasinghe U.A. [1 ]
Smakhtin V. [2 ]
Bharati L. [3 ]
Malik R.P.S. [4 ]
机构
[1] International Water Management Institute, South Asia Regional Office, Patancheru, Hyderabad, 502 324 Andhra Pradesh
[2] International Water Management Institute, Head Quarters, Colombo
[3] International Water Management Institute, Nepal Office, Kathmandu
[4] International Water Management Institute, New Delhi Office, New Delhi
关键词
Canal irrigation; Consumptive water use; Environmental flows; Irrigation benefits; Irrigation efficiency; Marginal productivity;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-012-9385-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper assesses the potential loss of irrigation benefits in reallocating water from irrigation to meet requirements for environmental flows (e-flows) in the Upper Ganga Basin (UGB) in northern India. The minimum requirement for e-flows in the UGB is 32 billion cubic meters (BCM), or 42 % of the mean annual runoff. The current runoff during the low-flow months falls below the minimum requirement for e-flows by 5. 1 BCM. Depending on irrigation efficiency, reallocation of 41-51 % of the water from canal irrigation withdrawals can meet this deficit in minimum e-flows. The marginal productivity of canal irrigation consumptive water use (CWU), estimated from a panel regression with data from 32 districts from 1991 to 2004, assesses the potential loss of benefits in diverting water away from crop production. In the UGB, canal irrigation contributes to only 8 % of the total CWU of 56 BCM, and the marginal productivity of canal irrigation CWU across districts is also very low, with a median of 0. 03 USD/m3. Therefore, at present, the loss of benefits is only 1. 2-1. 6 % of the gross value of crop production. This loss of benefits can be overcome with an increase in irrigation efficiency or marginal productivity. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 405
页数:20
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
Allan J.A., Water in the environment/socio-economic development discourse: Sustainability, changing management paradigms and policy responses in a global system, Government and Opposition, 40, pp. 181-199, (2005)
[2]
Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D., Smith M., Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements, (1998)
[3]
Amarasinghe U.A., Shah T., Smakhtin V., Water-milk nexus in India: A path to a sustainable water future?, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 16, (2011)
[4]
Amarasinghe U., Shah T., Turral H., Anand B.K., India's water future to 2025-2050: Business-as-usual scenario and deviations, (2007)
[5]
Amarasinghe U.A., Sharma B.R., Aloysius N., Scott C., Smakhtin V., de Fraiture C., Sinha A.K., Shukla A.K., Spatial variation in water supply and demand across river basins of India, IWMI Research Report 83, (2005)
[6]
Bates B.C., Kundzewicz Z.W., Wu S., Palutikof J.P., Climate Change and Water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (2008)
[7]
Bharati L., Lacombe G., Gurung P., Jayakody P., Hoanh C.T., Smakhtin V., The impacts of water infrastructure and climate change on the hydrology of the Upper Ganga River, IWMI Research Report 142, (2011)
[8]
Bhatia R., Malik R.P.S., Bhatia M., Direct and indirect economic impacts of the Bhakra multipurpose dam, India, Irrigation and Drainage, 56, pp. 195-206, (2007)
[9]
Water for food, water for life
[10]
a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture, (2007)