Tarred and Untarred by the Same Brush: Exploring Interdependence in the Volatility of Stock Returns

被引:26
作者
Barnett M.L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Management & Organization, College of Business Administration, University South Florida, Tampa, FL
关键词
collective strategy; communal strategy; industry self-regulation; reputation commons problems; trade associations;
D O I
10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550035
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When a firm suffers a major accident, its stock price is likely to become more volatile, but does this accident also increase the volatility of the stocks of rivals? Following a major accident, rivals sometimes unite through their trade association to implement an industry self-regulatory program. Do such collective efforts help to stabilize the stocks of firms in these threatened industries? This paper presents a longitudinal empirical study of the influence of a major accident by a single firm – Union Carbide's deadly poison gas leak in Bhopal, India – on the volatility of the stock prices of other chemical firms, and the influence of this industry's intensive collective efforts to recover from this major accident – the American Chemistry Council's Responsible Care Program – on the stock price volatility of these same firms. Results indicate that the volatility of the stocks of chemical firms increased after Union Carbide's tragic accident and that this volatility decreased for Responsible Care members but not for non-members. These findings suggest that a firm's stock price may be destabilized by the actions of a rival and that through cooperation with rivals, a firm may restabilize its stock price. Thus, this study provides empirical insight about the nature of the interdependent relationship among rivals and the benefits that trade associations and industry self-regulation may provide for participating, and non-participating, firms. © 2007, Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 21
页数:18
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Aldrich H., Organizations Evolving, (1999)
  • [2] Aldrich H., Fiol M., ‘Fools tush in? The institutional context of industry creation’, Academy of Management Review, 19, 4, pp. 645-671, (1994)
  • [3] Aldrich H., Staber U., ‘Organizing business interests: Patterns of trade association foundings, transformations, and deaths’, Ecological Models of Organizations, pp. 111-126, (1988)
  • [4] Amburgey T., Kelly D., Barnett W., ‘Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 1, pp. 51-73, (1993)
  • [5] Press Release in Honour of 1996 Earth Day, (1996)
  • [6] (2002)
  • [7] Astley W.G., ‘Toward an appreciation of collective strategy’, Academy of Management Review, 9, 3, pp. 526-535, (1984)
  • [8] Astley W.G., Fombrun C.J., ‘Collective strategy: Social ecology of organizational environments’, Academy of Management Review, 8, 4, pp. 576-587, (1983)
  • [9] Barnett M.L., ‘From me to we … and back again: Returning to business as usual’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 11, 3, pp. 249-252, (2002)
  • [10] Barnett M.L., ‘Waves of collectivizing: A dynamic model of competition and cooperation over the life of an industry’, Corporate Reputation Review, 8, 4, pp. 272-292, (2006)