Comparative assessment of three different indices of multimorbidity for studies on health-related quality of life

被引:132
作者
Fortin M. [1 ,2 ]
Hudon C. [1 ,2 ]
Dubois M.-F. [3 ,4 ]
Almirall J. [2 ]
Lapointe L. [2 ]
Soubhi H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Family Medicine, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, Que.
[2] Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, Que.
[3] Department of Community Health Sciences, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, Que.
[4] Research Center on Aging, Sherbrooke University, Geriatric Institute, Sherbrooke, Que.
关键词
Mental Component Summary; Physical Aspect; Mental Component Summary Score; Charlson Index; Mental Aspect;
D O I
10.1186/1477-7525-3-74
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Measures of multimorbidity are often applied to source data, populations or outcomes outside the scope of their original developmental work. As the development of a multimorbidity measure is influenced by the population and outcome used, these influences should be taken into account when selecting a multimorbidity index. The aim of this study was to compare the strength of the association of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) with three multimorbidity indices: the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), the Charlson index (Charlson) and the Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI). The first two indices were not developed in light of HRQOL. Methods: We used data on chronic diseases and on the SF-36 questionnaire assessing HRQOL of 238 adult primary care patients who participated in a previous study. We extracted all the diagnoses for every patient from chart review to score the CIRS, the FCI and the Charlson. Data for potential confounders (age, sex, self-perceived economic status and self-perceived social support) were also collected. We calculated the Pearson correlation coefficients (r) of the SF-36 scores with the three measures of multimorbidity, as well as the coefficient of determination, R2 , while controlling for confounders. Results: The r values for the CIRS (range: -0.55 to -0.18) were always higher than those for the FCI (-0.47 to -0.10) and Charlson (-0.31 to -0.04) indices. The CIRS explained the highest percent of variation in all scores of the SF-36, except for the Mental Component Summary Score where the variation was not significant. Variations explained by the FCI were significant in all scores of SF-36 measuring physical health and in two scales evaluating mental health. Variations explained by the Charlson were significant in only three scores measuring physical health. Conclusions: The CIRS is a better choice as a measure of multimorbidity than the FCI and the Charlson when HRQOL is the outcome of interest. However, the FCI may provide a good option to evaluate the physical aspect of HRQOL for the ease in its administration and scoring. The Charlson index may not be recommended as a measure of multimorbidity in studies related to either physical or mental aspects of HRQOL. © 2005 Fortin et al., licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Harboun M., Ankri J., Comorbidity indexes: Review of the literature and application to studies of elderly population, Rev. Epidemiol. Sante Publique, 49, pp. 287-298, (2001)
[2]  
de Groot V., Beckerman H., Lankhorst G.J., Bouter L.M., How to measure comorbidity. A critical review of available methods, J. Clin. Epidemiol., 56, pp. 221-229, (2003)
[3]  
Cheng L., Cumber S., Dumas C., Winter R., Nguyen K.M., Nieman L.Z., Health related quality of life in pregeriatric patients witn chronic diseases at urban, public supported clinics, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, (2003)
[4]  
Wensing M., Vingerhoets E., Grol R., Functional status, health problems, age and comorbidity in primary care patients, Qual. Life Res., 10, pp. 141-148, (2001)
[5]  
Michelson H., Bolund C., Brandberg Y., Multiple chronic health problems are negatively asociated with health related quality of life (HRQoL) irrespective of age, Qual. Life Res., 9, pp. 1093-1104, (2000)
[6]  
Cuijpers P., van Lammeren P., Duzijn B., Relation between quality of life and chronic illnesses in elderly living in residential homes: A prospective study, Int. Psychogeriatr., 11, pp. 445-454, (1999)
[7]  
Grimby A., Svanborg A., Morbidity and health-related quality of life among ambulant elderly citizens, Aging Clin. Exp. Res., 9, pp. 356-364, (1997)
[8]  
Fortin M., Bravo G., Hudon C., Lapointe L., Almirall J., Dubois M.F., Vanasse A., Relationship between multimorbidity and health-related quality of life of patients in primary care, Qual. Life Res., (2005)
[9]  
Perkins A.J., Kroenke K., Unutzer J., Katon W., Williams J.W., Hope C., Callahan C.M., Common comorbidity scales were similar in their ability to predict health care costs and mortality, J. Clin. Epidemiol., 57, pp. 1040-1048, (2004)
[10]  
Extermann M., Measurement and impact of comorbidity in older cancer patients, Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol., 35, pp. 181-200, (2000)