Gene conversion homogenizes the CMT1A paralogous repeats

被引:28
作者
Hurles M.E. [1 ]
机构
[1] McDonald Inst. for Archaeol. Res., University of Cambridge, Cambridge
关键词
Gene Conversion; Gene Conversion Event; Interactive Data Language; Disperse Repeat; Absolute Identity;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2164-2-11
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Non-allelic homologous recombination between paralogous repeats is increasingly being recognized as a major mechanism causing both pathogenic microdeletions and duplications, and structural polymorphism in the human genome. It has recently been shown empirically that gene conversion can homogenize such repeats, resulting in longer stretches of absolute identity that may increase the rate of non-allelic homologous recombination. Results: Here, a statistical test to detect gene conversion between pairs of non-coding sequences is presented. It is shown that the 24 kb Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A paralogous repeats (CMT1A- REPs) exhibit the imprint of gene conversion processes whilst control orthologous sequences do not. In addition, Monte Carlo simulations of the evolutionary divergence of the CMT1A-REPs, incorporating two alternative models for gene conversion, generate repeats that are statistically indistinguishable from the observed repeats. Bounds are placed on the rate of these conversion processes, with central values of 1.3 × 10-4 and 5.1 × 10-5 per generation for the alternative models. Conclusions: This evidence presented here suggests that gene conversion may have played an important role in the evolution of the CMT1A-REP paralogous repeats. The rates of these processes are such that it is probable that homogenized CMT1A-REPs are polymorphic within modern populations. Gene conversion processes are similarly likely to play an important role in the evolution of other segmental duplications and may influence the rate of non-allelic homologous recombination between them. © 2001 Hurles: lincensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Lupski J., Genomic disorders: Structural features of the genome can lead to DNA rearrangements and human disease traits, Trends Genet., 14, pp. 417-422, (1998)
[2]  
Emanuel B.S., Segmental duplications: An expanding role in genomic instability and disease, Nature Reviews Genetics, 2, pp. 791-800, (2001)
[3]  
Eichler E.E., Recent duplication, domain accretion and the dynamic mutation of the human genome, Trends Genet., 17, pp. 661-669, (2001)
[4]  
Pentao L., Wise C.A., Chinault A.C., Patel P.I., Lupski J.R., Charcot-Marie-Tooth Type-la Duplication Appears to Arise from Recombination at Repeat Sequences Flanking the 1.5 Mb Monomer Unit, Nature Genetics, 2, pp. 292-300, (1992)
[5]  
Chance P.F., Abbas N., Lensch M.W., Pentao L., Roa B.B., Patel P.I., Lupski J.R., Autosomal-Dominant Neuropathies Result from Reciprocal DNA Duplication/Deletion of a Region on Chromosome-17, Human Molecular Genetics, 3, pp. 223-228, (1994)
[6]  
Potocki L., Chen K.-S., Park S.-S., Osterholm D.E., Withers M.A., Kimonis V., Summers A.M., Meschino W.S., Anyane-Yeboa K., Kashork C.D., Shaffer L.S., Lupski J.R., Molecular mechanism for duplication 17p11.2 - The homologous recombination reciprocal of the Smith-Magenis microdeletion, Nat. Genet., 24, pp. 84-87, (2000)
[7]  
Lakich D., Kazazian H.H., Antonarakis S.E., Gitschier J., Inversions Disrupting the Factor-VIII Gene Are a Common-Cause of Severe Hemophilia-A, Nature Genetics, 5, pp. 236-241, (1993)
[8]  
Tilford C.A., Kuroda-Kawaguchi T., Skaletsky H., Rozen S., Brown L.G., Rosenberg M., McPherson J.D., Wylie K., Sekhon M., Kucaba T.A., Waterston R.H., Page D.C., A physical map of the human Y chromosome, Nature, 409, pp. 943-945, (2001)
[9]  
Small K., Iber J., Warren S.T., Emerin deletion reveals a common X-chromosome inversion mediated by inverted repeats, Nature Genetics, 16, pp. 96-99, (1997)
[10]  
Giglio S., Broman K.W., Matsumoto N., Calvari V., Gimelli G., Neumann T., Ohashi H., Voullaire L., Larizza D., Giorda R., Weber J.L., Ledbetter D.H., Zuffardi O., Olfactory receptor-gene clusters, genomic-inversion polymorphisms, and common chromosome rearrangements, American Journal of Human Genetics, 68, pp. 874-883, (2001)