Views of bereaved multiple-birth parents on life support decisions, the dying process, and discussions surrounding death

被引:64
作者
Pector E.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Spectrum Family Medicine, Naperville, IL 60540
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.jp.7211001
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study assessed the experiences of bereaved parents of multiples with resuscitation and life-support discussions, the death process, and conversations with health-care professionals about death. Study Design: In all, 71 bereaved parents of multiples recruited from Internet support groups completed a narrative e-mail survey assessing many facets of bereavement. Numeric data were analyzed using simple quantitative analysis, with a grounded theory approach used for qualitative data. Results: Most decisions were collaborative, with occasional directive comments. Some decisions were made during crises. Occasionally, parents initiated life-support discussions. Multidisciplinary meetings occurred with 30%, but were desired by more parents. A total of 18% of parents encountered criticism of choices. Most parents attended resuscitation, and found meaning in holding their dying children. Many desire privacy, availability of symptom management, and family or clergy involvement. Photographs of multiples together are valued. Parents offered many suggestions for compassionate death notification, which most felt should occur in person if parents are not present for the death. Respondents valued clear, prompt discussion of the cause of death, and clinician availability for later review of clinical events or decisions. Conclusions: Multiple-birth parents' choices resemble those of singleton parents at the end of an infant's life.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 10
页数:6
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Harrison H., Principles for family-centered neonatal care, Pediatrics, 92, 5, pp. 643-650, (1993)
[2]  
McHaffie H.E., Laing I.A., Parker M., McMillan J., Deciding for imperilled newborns: Medical authority or parental autonomy?, J. Med. Ethics, 27, 2, pp. 104-109, (2001)
[3]  
McHaffie H.E., Laing I.A., Lloyd D.J., Follow up care of bereaved parents after treatment withdrawal from newborns, Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal. Educ., 84, (2001)
[4]  
MacDonald H., Perinatal care at the threshold of viability, Pediatrics, 110, 5, pp. 1024-1027, (2002)
[5]  
Campbell D.E., Fleischman A.R., Limits of viability: Dilemmas, decisions, and decision makers, Am. J. Perinatol., 18, 3, pp. 117-128, (2001)
[6]  
Richardson D.K., A woman with an extremely premature newborn, JAMA, 286, 12, pp. 1498-1505, (2001)
[7]  
Streiner D.L., Saigal S., Burrows E., Stoskopf B., Rosenbaum P., Attitudes of parents and health care professionals toward active treatment of extremely premature infants, Pediatrics, 108, 1, pp. 152-157, (2001)
[8]  
Saigal S., Burrows E., Stoskopf B.L., Rosenbaum P.L., Streiner D., Impact of exreme prematurity on families of adolescent children, J. Pediatr., 137, 5, pp. 701-706, (2000)
[9]  
Ryan R.M., Loss in the neonatal period: Recommendations for the pediatric health care team, Loss During Pregnancy or in the Newborn Period: Principles of Care With Clinical Cases and Analysis, pp. 125-148, (1997)
[10]  
Natl. Vital. Statist. Rep., 50, 5, pp. 18-20, (2002)