Robotic assisted Laparoscopic partial Nephrectomy for suspected Renal Cell Carcinoma: Retrospective review of surgical outcomes of 35 Cases

被引：25

作者：

Bhayani S.B. ^{[1
]}

Das N. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO

来源：

BMC Surgery | / 8卷 / 1期

关键词：

Renal Cell Carcinoma; Partial Nephrectomy; Warm Ischemia; Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy; Robotic Assistance;

D O I：

10.1186/1471-2482-8-16

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background. A standard of care for the treatment of small renal masses is partial nephrectomy. The open and laparoscopic approaches have been well described in the literature. Robotic assistance may augment partial nephrectomy by aiding in dissection and renal reconstruction. In this communication we describe the surgical outcomes of 35 patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy. Methods. Patient records and databases were reviewed for 35 consecutive patients undergoing RPN. Clinical, pathological, and radiographic data were obtained. The data was deidentified. Results. Thirty five patients successfully underwent RPN. An additional 2 patients were converted to other nephron sparing procedures. Mean tumor size was 2.8 cm, and mean OR time was 142 minutes. Mean warm ischemia time was 20 minutes. All margins were negative. There were 4 complications, and no patients required reoperation. Conclusion. Robotic partial nephrectomy can produce excellent initial results. Further studies should be performed to compare the outcomes to laparoscopic and open operations. © 2008 Bhayani and Das; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

引用

共 19 条

[1]

Uzzo R.G., Novick A.C., Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: Indications, techniques and outcomes, J Urol, 166, pp. 6-18, (2001)

[2]

McDougall E.M., Clayman R.V., Anderson K., Laparoscopic wedge resection of a renal tumor: Initial experience, J Laparoendosc Surg, 3, pp. 577-81, (1993)

[3]

Winfield H.N., Donovan J.F., Godet A.S., Clayman R.V., Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Initial case report for benign disease, J Endourol, 7, pp. 521-6, (1993)

[4]

Gill I.S., Kavoussi L.R., Lane B.R., Blute M.L., Babineau D., Colombo Jr. J.R., Frank I., Permpongkosol S., Weight C.J., Kaouk J.H., Kattan M.W., Novick A.C., Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors, J Urol, 178, pp. 41-6, (2007)

[5]

Badani K.K., Kaul S., Menon M., Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: Assessment after 2766 procedures, Cancer, 110, pp. 1951-8, (2007)

[6]

Deane L.A., Lee H.J., Box G.N., Melamud O., Yee D.S., Abraham J.B., Finley D.S., Borin J.F., McDougall E.M., Clayman R.V., Ornstein D.K., Robotic versus Standard Laparoscopic Partial/Wedge Nephrectomy: A Comparison of Intraoperative and Perioperative Results from a Single Institution, J Endourol, 22, pp. 947-952, (2008)

[7]

Aron M., Koenig P., Kaouk J.H., Nguyen M.M., Desai M.M., Gill I.S., Robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A matched-pair comparison from a high-volume centre, BJU Int, 102, pp. 86-92, (2008)

[8]

Rogers C.G., Singh A., Blatt A.M., Linehan W.M., Pinto P.A., Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: Surgical technique, Eur Urol, 53, pp. 514-21, (2008)

[9]

Kaul S., Laungani R., Sarle R., Stricker H., Peabody J., Littleton R., Menon M., Da Vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: Technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up, Eur Urol, 51, pp. 186-91, (2007)

[10]

Caruso R.P., Phillips C.K., Kau E., Taneja S.S., Stifelman M.D., Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Initial experience, J Urol, 176, pp. 36-9, (2006)

← 1 2 →