Sagittal balance analysis after pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis.

被引:42
作者
Debarge R. [1 ]
Demey G. [1 ]
Roussouly P. [1 ]
机构
[1] CMC, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Centre des Massues, Lyon
关键词
Kyphosis; Ankylosing spondylitis; Pedicle subtraction osteotomy; Spino-sacral-angle;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-011-1929-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This is a radiographic study of ankylosing spondylitis patients with severe fixed kyphotic deformity who underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Our goal was to measure and validate new angle to assess global kyphosis and to evaluate the sagittal balance after surgery. This is the first report which describes new angle to assess global kyphosis (T1-S1). Pre and postoperative controls were compared according to the Pelvic Incidence. The sagittal parameters ankylosing spondylitis patients were compared with 154 asymptomatic patients. In addition to the pelvic parameters and the C7 tilt, we used the spino-sacral angle. Pelvic incidence in ankylosing spondylitis patients was higher than asymptomatic population (61° vs. 51°). For a same tilt of C7 for both groups, the low pelvic incidence group had a lower sacral slope and pelvic tilt and a higher global kyphosis (spino-sacral angle = 90°) than the high pelvic incidence group (spino-sacral angle = 98°). In the adult volunteers, the C7 tilt and spino-sacral angle measured, respectively, 95° and 135°. The preoperative C7 tilt measured 73° and increased to 83° (p = 0.0025). The preoperative spino-sacral angle measured 96° and increased to 113.3° (p = 0.003). A low pelvic incidence pelvis has a lower sacral slope than in high pelvic incidence and can support a bigger kyphosis. All the parameters were improved by the pedicle subtraction osteotomy, but the average spinosacral angle remained lower than the control group. When C7 tilt was useful to assess the improvement of the sagittal balance, SSA allowed a better evaluation of the correction of kyphosis itself.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 625
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]
McMaster MJ(1973)Spinal osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis. Technique, complications, and long-term results Mayo Clin Proc 48 476-486
[2]
Coventry MB(1977)The clinical biomechanics of kyphotic deformities Clin Orthop Relat Res 128 8-17
[3]
White AA(2001)Management of fixed sagittal plane deformity: results of the transpedicular wedge resection osteotomy Spine 26 2036-2043
[4]
Panjabi MM(2002)Clinical outcome results of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis with kyphotic deformity Spine 27 612-618
[5]
Thomas CL(2000)Deformity planning for sagittal plane corrective osteotomies of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis Eur Spine J 9 492-498
[6]
Berven SH(1998)Accuracy of the sagittal vertical axis in a standing lateral radiograph as a measurement of balance in spinal deformities Eur Spine J 7 408-412
[7]
Deviren V(1986)Corrective osteotomy of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Experience with 66 cases Clin Orthop Relat Res 208 157-167
[8]
Smith JA(2003)Significance of chin-brow vertical angle in correction of kyphotic deformity of ankylosing spondylitis patients Spine 28 2001-2005
[9]
Kim KT(1998)Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves Eur Spine J 7 99-103
[10]
Suk KS(2003)Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A 454-463