A methodology for the evaluation of travel techniques for immersive virtual environments

被引:82
作者
Bowman D.A. [1 ,2 ]
Koller D. [1 ]
Hodges L.F. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Computing, Graphics, Visualization, and Usability Center, Atlanta, GA
[2] College of Computing, Graphics, Visualization, and Usability Center, Atlanta, CA 30332-0280
关键词
Evaluation; information gathering; Interaction techniques; Virtual environments;
D O I
10.1007/BF01417673
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We present a framework for the analysis and evaluation of travel, or viewpoint motion control, techniques for use in immersive virtual environments (VEs). In previous work, we presented a taxonomy of travel techniques and a set of experiments mapping parts of the taxonomy to various performance metrics. Since these initial experiments, we have expanded the framework to allow evaluation of not only the effects of different travel techniques, but also the effects of many outside factors simultaneously. Combining this expanded framework with the measurement of multiple response variables epitomises the philosophy of testbed evaluation. This experimental philosophy leads to a deeper understanding of the interaction and the technique(s) in question, as well as to broadly generalisable results. We also present an example experiment within this expanded framework, which evaluates the user's ability to gather information while travelling through a virtual environment. Results indicate that, of the variables tested, the complexity of the environment is by far the most important factor. © Springer-Verlag London Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 131
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]  
Slater M., Usoh M., Steed A., Taking steps: The influence of a walking metaphor on presence in virtual reality, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 2, 3, pp. 201-219, (1995)
[22]  
Stanney K., Realizing the full potential of virtual reality: Human factors issues that could stand in the way, Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, pp. 28-34, (1995)
[23]  
Bowman D., Koller D., Hodges L., Travel in immersive virtual environments: An evaluation of viewpoint motion control techniques, Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, pp. 45-52, (1997)
[24]  
Chin J., Diehl V., Norman K., Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the humancomputer interface, Proceedings of CHI, pp. 213-218, (1988)
[25]  
Kennedy R., Lane N., Berbaum K., Lilienthal M., A simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ): A new method for quantifying simulator sickness, International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 3, pp. 203-220, (1993)
[26]  
User Models in Dialog Systems., (1989)
[27]  
Bowman D., Hodges L., An evaluation of techniques for grabbing and manipulating remote objects in immersive virtual environments, Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, pp. 35-38, (1997)
[28]  
Poupyrev I., Billinghurst M., Weghorst S., Ichikawa T., The go-go interaction technique: Non-linear mapping for direct manipulation in VR, Proceedings of the Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 79-80, (1996)
[29]  
Ware C., Balakrishnan R., Reaching for objects in VR displays: Lag and frame rate, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 1, 4, pp. 331-356, (1994)
[30]  
Lampton D., Knerr B., Goldberg S., Bliss J., Moshell J., Blau B., The virtual environment performance assessment battery (VEPAB): Development and evaluation, Presence, 3, 2, pp. 145-157, (1994)