Do trade and investment agreements lead to more FDI? Accounting for key provisions inside the black box

被引:17
作者
Berger A. [1 ]
Busse M. [2 ]
Nunnenkamp P. [3 ]
Roy M. [4 ]
机构
[1] German Development Institute, Bonn
[2] Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum
[3] Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel
[4] Secretariat of the World Trade Organization, Geneva
关键词
Admission rules; Bilateral investment treaties; Foreign direct investment; Investor-state dispute settlement; Regional trade agreements;
D O I
10.1007/s10368-012-0207-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The previous literature provides a highly ambiguous picture on the impact of trade and investment agreements on FDI. Most empirical studies ignore the actual content of BITs and RTAs, treating them as "black boxes", despite the diversity of investment provisions constituting the essence of these agreements. We overcome this serious limitation by analyzing the impact of modalities on the admission of FDI and dispute settlement mechanisms in both RTAs and BITs on bilateral FDI flows between 1978 and 2004. We find that FDI reacts positively to RTAs only if they offer liberal admission rules. Dispute settlement provisions play a minor role. While RTAs without strong investment provisions may even discourage FDI, the reactions to BITs are less discriminate with foreign investors responding favourably to the mere existence of BITs. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 275
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adams, R., Dee, P., Gali, J., McGuire, G., (2003) The trade and investment effects of preferential trading arrangements-old and new evidence, , Productivity Commission Staff Working Paper. Canberra
  • [2] Adlung, R., Molinuevo, M., Bilateralism in services trade: is there fire behind the (BIT-)smoke? (2008) J Int Econ Law, 11 (2), pp. 365-409
  • [3] Allee, T., Peinhardt, C., Delegating differences: bilateral investment treaties and bargaining over dispute resolution provisions (2010) Int Stud Q, 54 (1), pp. 1-26
  • [4] Anderson, J.E., van Wincoop, E., Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle (2003) Am Econ Rev, 93 (1), pp. 170-192
  • [5] Arellano, M., Bover, O., Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error component models (1995) J Econ, 68 (1), pp. 29-51
  • [6] Baier, S.L., Bergstrand, J.H., The economic determinants of free trade agreements (2004) J Int Econ, 64 (1), pp. 29-63
  • [7] Baier, S.L., Bergstrand, J.H., Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade? (2007) J Int Econ, 71 (1), pp. 72-95
  • [8] Baier, S.L., Bergstrand, J.H., Estimating the effects of free trade agreements on international trade flows using matching econometrics (2009) J Int Econ, 77 (1), pp. 63-76
  • [9] Baier, S.L., Bergstrand, J.H., Approximating general equilibrium impacts of trade liberalizations using the gravity equation: applications to NAFTA and the European economic area (2010) The Gravity Model in International Trade: Advances and Applications, pp. 88-134. , P. A. G. Bergeijkvan and S. Brakman (Eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • [10] Baldwin, R., (2008) Big-Think Regionalism: A Critical Survey. NBER Working Paper 14056, , Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research