The current and potential role of cryoablation as a primary therapy for localized prostate cancer

被引:39
作者
Aaron E. Katz
John C. Rewcastle
机构
[1] Department of Urology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY 10032
关键词
Prostate Cancer; Radical Prostatectomy; Gleason Score; Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; Localize Prostate Cancer;
D O I
10.1007/s11912-003-0115-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Targeted cryoablation of the prostate has evolved significantly since its reintroduction in the early 1990s. This evolution stems from engineering advancements, procedural refinement, introduction of temperature monitoring, and greater understanding of cryobiology. Recent publications demonstrate durable efficacy for cryoablation, equivalent to other therapies for low-risk disease and possibly superior for moderate- and high-risk prostate cancer. Morbidity following the procedure is mild in comparison with other therapies, with the exception of sexual function impairment However, longer-term quality-of-life studies show that a significant number of patients return to having intercourse, and late-onset morbidities are not observed. These results contrast with those for radiotherapy - specifically brachytherapy - for which several recent studies document a decline in sexual function, protracted morbidity, and the emergence of late-onset morbidity. Cryoablation is an effective therapy with acceptable morbidity that should be offered as a treatment option to all patients with localized prostate cancer. Furthermore, cryoablation has the potential ability to be tailored to an individual patient's disease. As diagnostic tools and methods continue to advance, it may become possible to target the less aggressive forms of prostate cancer. Focal cryoablation may prove to be an ideal treatment modality in this setting. Copyright © 2003 by Current Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 238
页数:7
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Cancer Facts and Figures 2002, (2002)
[2]  
Polascik T.J., Pound C.R., deWeese T.L., Walsh P.C., Comparison of radical prostatectomy and iodine 125 interstitial radiotherapy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer: A 7-year biochemical (PSA) progression analysis, Urology, 51, pp. 884-890, (1998)
[3]  
Stokes S.H., Comparison of biochemical disease-free survival of patients with localized carcinoma of the prostate undergoing radical prostatectomy, transperineal ultrasound-guided radioactive seed implantation, or definitive external beam irradiation, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 47, pp. 129-136, (2000)
[4]  
Bahn D.K., Lee F., Badalament R., Et al., Targeted cryoablation of the prostate: Seven-year outcomes in the primary treatment of prostate cancer, Urology, 60, SUPPL. 2A, pp. 3-11, (2002)
[5]  
Long J.P., Bahn D., Lee S., Et al., Five year retrospective, multi-institutional pooled analysis of cancer-related outcomes after cryosurgical ablation of the prostate, Urology, 57, pp. 518-523, (2001)
[6]  
Ragde H., Blasko J.C., Grimm P.D., Et al., Interstitial iodine-125 radiation without adjuvant therapy in the treatment of clinically localized prostate carcinoma, Cancer, 80, pp. 442-453, (1997)
[7]  
Rossi C.J., Conformal proton beam therapy of prostate cancer-update on the Loma Linda University medical center experience, Strahlenther Onkol., 175, SUPPL., pp. 282-284, (1999)
[8]  
Hanlon A.L., Hanks G.E., Failure pattern implications following external beam irradiation of prostate cancer: Long-term follow-up and indications of cure, Cancer J., 6, SUPPL. 2, (2000)
[9]  
Martinez A.A., Gonzalez J.A., Chung A.K., Et al., A comparison of external beam radiation therapy versus radical prostatectomy for patients stages with low risk prostate carcinoma diagnosed, stages, and treated at a single institution, Cancer, 88, pp. 425-432, (2000)
[10]  
D'Amico A.V., Whittington R., Malkowicz S.B., Et al., Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer, JAMA, 280, pp. 969-974, (1998)